Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split on valence, not on fact. Everyone hears the same bright, lean, vocal-forward, diffuse-field balance the graphs show. For the larger camp it is a feature — honest, controlled, refreshingly free of the bass shelf every rival now ships — and a specialist tuning for acoustic, classical, vocal and Asian pop. For the smaller but heavier-weighted camp led by headphones.com it is the problem: a tilt toward the upper midrange that most genres punish, and the reason it is 'a headphone defined by extremes'.
Measured
Three rigs, one shape (normalised at 500 Hz): Super* Review's KEMAR reads 20 Hz at −1.4 dB and an ear-gain peak of +11.5 to +11.7 dB at 2.5–3 kHz, 2.4–3.3 dB above his tilted diffuse-field target; Jaytiss's B&K 5128 reads +13.7 dB at 3 kHz, 5.7 dB above his tilted-DF target; Passion for Sound's rig reads +13.9 dB at 3 kHz, 6.0 dB above his neutral reference. On each fixture the Skyland carries 3–5 dB more 2–3 kHz than an Arya Unveiled and 4–6 dB more than the Cosmo, with the same bass. Headphones.com describes it as 'essentially raw Diffuse Field'; Moondrop says it follows its VDSF target.
vs. listeners — The camps are not arguing about the curve — they are arguing about whether a curve that matches a diffuse-field reference but sits 2–6 dB over the tilted preference targets in the ear-gain region is a virtue. Preference governs here, and the measurements can't settle it.
“Testing it across multiple gears, it is indeed tuned to be on the bright and extended side, yet it remains nicely controlled at high volumes and with intense, sharp vocals.”
James Tan, Headfonics
“The result is a presentation that is bright, lean, and heavily midrange-forward.”
headphones.com (The Headphone Show)
