Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Most sources hear a full, punchy, mid-bass-forward low end — the thing several call its best feature — while a smaller group hears a polite, supportive bass with restrained sub-bass. Nearly everyone on both sides agrees the emphasis is mid-bass rather than sub-bass, that it stays clean of the mids, and that it never reaches basshead territory. The measurements complicate the language: there is no mid-bass hump and no roll-off.
“The bass is fuller than many listeners might expect from an open-back headphone. There is a clear mid-bass emphasis”
Goh Beng Yeow, Porta-Fi
“It's got a thick and heavy slam to it, more midbass than subbass focused.”
u/cl0ckw0rkaut0mat0n, r/headphones
“Overall, the bass performance is just average at best.”
DestinoAzell, Head-Fi showcase review
“EDM 계열에서는 다소 맥이 빠집니다. 이는 저역의 양감이 부족한 것이 가장 큰 영향을 줍니다.”
그리피스의꿈, Naver blog
Measured
Flat with no shelf on both rigs: 20 Hz sits within 0.5 dB (Elrics 711/KB50xx, five seatings) and 1.5 dB (Passion for Sound B&K 5128) of 500 Hz — 2–3 dB under a tilted diffuse-field target and about 5 dB under Harman 2018 in the bottom two octaves, but 7.8 dB above an HD 600 at 20 Hz on the same 711 rig and level with an HD 660S2 on the same 5128. 150–300 Hz is only 0.5–1.2 dB over target.
vs. listeners — Listeners describe a mid-bass emphasis and a restrained sub-bass; neither rig shows a mid-bass hump, and both show full extension. The 'punch' is the 1–2 kHz recession letting the upper bass and lower mids stand forward, and the 'restrained sub-bass' is the absence of a shelf rather than roll-off — which is also why the same graph reads as 'not warm' to graph-readers and 'very warm' to listeners.
