HeadphoneOverreview

Dan Clark Audio Stealth

It measures about as close to the target as a closed-back ever has — and still splits listeners on slam, seal and price.

48 sourcesUpdated
$4,500Typical US price

Score aggregates reviewer opinions across topics.

View product
Dan Clark Audio Stealth

The short version

What to know.

A closed-back planar flagship that measures close to the common targets on eleven rigs, isolates like a studio headphone and, by wide agreement, doesn't sound closed-in. Sources agree on its imaging and separation, its isolation, and a tuning most hear as correct; they largely agree on its build and resolution, with caveats about pad life and the very top of the class. They divide on physicality — most hear soft attacks and modest slam, a minority hear plenty once the amp and seal are right — on how much bass it really has, which depends unusually heavily on seal, clamp and pad condition, on whether its smooth treble is correct or too polite, on fit for some heads, and on value now that it costs $4,500 and the E3 exists.

About this product

The closed-back flagship, and the headphone AMTS debuted in. It shares the fourth-generation V-Planar driver and the folding AEON-derived chassis with the open-back EXPANSE that followed in 2022, but its AMTS insert is tuned for this cup. Not the ETHER C Flow it replaced, and not the cheaper AMTS-equipped E3 (2023), which owners compare it with constantly. Sold in one finish; the only choice at checkout is the cable's length and termination.

Dan Clark Audio spent about four years on the Stealth, and when it arrived in August 2021 at $3,999 it did something no closed-back had managed: it measured, on rig after rig, about as close to the common over-ear targets as anything anyone had put on a fixture. The mechanism was new too — an Acoustic Metamaterial Tuning System, a 3D-printed honeycomb of waveguides and resonators between driver and ear, which has since spread through most of the company's line.

Five years on it costs $4,499.99, it has a cheaper sibling in the E3 that borrows the same idea, and the graphs still have not ended the argument. Measurement sites call it one of the most correct headphones ever made; a steady minority of owners and demo listeners call it soft, finicky about its seal, or simply not worth twice the price of its little brother.

A good fit for

  • Anyone who needs a sealed headphone — shared rooms, offices, late nights — and doesn't want it to sound closed-in
  • Listeners who want target-accurate tuning without EQ and prize separation and layering
  • Owners of a powerful desktop amplifier
  • Travel, within reason: 415 g, self-adjusting, and it folds into a small case

Think twice if

  • Slam and physical impact are what you listen for — the complaint behind most returns
  • You wear thick-armed glasses, or can't get a consistent seal on your head shape
  • You want sparkle and air up top rather than a smooth, polite treble
  • You'd rather spend about half as much on the E3 and live with its slightly brighter tuning
  • Your source is a phone or a modest portable

The reviewer consensus

Agreement &
disagreement.

5 / 12topics divide opinion
2 Strong agreement5 Mostly agree5 Divided opinions

Common ground6

  • Measures about as close to the common over-ear targets as any closed-back — on eleven rigs, not one
  • Imaging and instrument separation are first-rate, even by its critics' account
  • It doesn't sound like a closed-back: open, reverb-free staging, if not an especially wide one

Points of contention5

  • Dynamics: most hear soft attacks and modest slam; a minority hears plenty once amp, clamp and pad position are right
  • Bass: deep and clean, lean unless the seal is perfect, or too much sub-bass — seal is what moves owners between the first two
  • Treble: correct and smooth to most, too relaxed to four in ten, and hot on at least one unit with a 5.5 kHz peak

A closer listen.

12 topics · 5 divided
Left: criticalRight: positiveTighter lines: more agreement

Tonality

PositiveMostly agree
Reviewer sentiment29 supporting sources
CriticalNeutralPositive

Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average

Most sources hear an unusually even, uncoloured balance and the measurements back them, rig after rig. A minority that has grown since launch hears the same curve as a little too bassy, a touch hot in the upper mids, or correct to the point of lifelessness — and Resolve, who recommended it in 2021, now calls it a bit shouty and strident in his ranking list.

“Yes! We have the highest compliance to our target curve of any headphone we have ever tested!”

amirm, Audio Science Review

“The first thing I thought when I listened to the STEALTH was that it simply sounded correct.”

VSG, TechPowerUp

“A bit too bassy which compounds w/ the treble darkness to result in something that sounds pretty good, but also pretty lifeless.”

Listener (Griffin Silver), Headphones.com ranking list

Measured

Eleven rigs agree on the shape. oratory1990's GRAS stays within about ±2.5 dB of the target from 20 Hz to 12 kHz, and ASR's GRAS 45C reports the only real deviation as a small bump between 100 and 160 Hz. Compared with the HD 600 on the same rig, six squig databases show a sub-bass shelf 10–15 dB higher at 20 Hz, a presence region within about 1.5 dB of it on five of the six, and a slight dip in the 200–300 Hz band on four.

Link to this topic

The hardware

Specifications.

Checked

Design

Type
Closed-back
Drivers
1 × 76 mm planar magnetic (76mm x 51mm single-ended)
Housing
Nickel-Titanium headband, carbon fiber baffle

Electrical

Impedance
23 Ω
Sensitivity
90 dB/mW≈ 106.4 dB/V

Connection

Cable
Detachable
Plugs supplied
6.35 mm, 4-pin XLR, 2.5 mm balanced, 4.4 mm balanced, 3.5 mm

Physical

Weight
415 g

Manufacturer-published figures, not measurements · from danclarkaudio.com.

Follow the evidence

Sources 48

1–6 of 48 sources

Read with context

Limitations & method.

As of

What to keep in mind 6

  1. A read of where the reviews land as of November 2026. Most were written in 2021 and 2022 against a $3,999 price; it now costs $4,499.99, and DCA's own E3 has arrived at about half that, so older value verdicts were formed against a different market.

  2. How much bass you get depends on the seal. Glasses arms, head shape, clamp and the age of the pads all move it, and several of the 'it's lean' verdicts came from demos or returns where the seal never settled — try it on your own head if you can.

Where to buy Product & retailer links