Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split almost exactly in half. Everyone agrees on the measured shape — lifted bass relative to a lowered, early ear gain, plus extra air — and they divide on whether it lands as a natural, fatigue-free alternative to Harman or as a warm tilt that gives up clarity.
Measured
Across 28 IEC-711-class squig.link rigs (switch off, levelled at 500 Hz against the Harman IE 2019 target, median): the sub-bass sits about on the target's shelf (−1.3 dB at 20–40 Hz), 100–200 Hz runs +1.2 dB, then 2–4 kHz falls 4.9 dB and 4–6 kHz 7.0 dB under the target before 12–16 kHz climbs 7.6 dB over it. The ear-gain peak lands at about 2.7 kHz and only around +5 dB, against roughly +8.6 dB at 4.3–4.5 kHz for the original SA6. TechPowerUp's own bench reads it as an 8.5 dB bass shelf from around 350 Hz.
vs. listeners — The 'bassy' verdict is relative, not absolute: measured against the target the bass is about where Harman puts it, and what tips the balance is the presence region sitting 5–7 dB low. That is the same fact one camp credits for the absence of shout and the other blames for the lost clarity — Resolve calls it a trade of clarity for euphony.
“Tuning on the SA6 MK2 is overall neutral with a slight U-shape and some sub-bass boost.”
Headfonics
“the overall tonal balance is shifted greatly towards the lows”
TechPowerUp
