Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split on what kind of IEM this is. A minority hear a balanced, versatile tuning that keeps the Monarch's monitor DNA and simply fills in the low end. Most hear a deliberately coloured U- or V-shape — more bass and more upper treble than the MKII — and then divide again on whether that colour is fun or unnatural: Crinacle prefers the MKII on taste, and two headphones.com ranking lists score the MKIII 4/10 for exactly this. If you specifically want the MKII's balance, the MKIII is not it.
Measured
Across 23 independent squig.link rigs (normalised at 500 Hz) the MKIII matches the Harman IE 2019 target's sub-bass almost exactly (+8.8 vs +9.0 dB at 20 Hz), runs about 1 dB over it at 100 Hz, sits roughly 2–3 dB under it from 3 to 6.5 kHz, and runs 5–8 dB over it at 13–16 kHz. RTINGS scores the bass "Emphasized (3 dB)", the treble "Balanced (-1 dB)" and the sound signature "Warm". On the 16 rigs that measured both generations, the MKIII adds a median ~1 dB at 80–150 Hz and ~2 dB at 4–6.5 kHz over the MKII.
“Very little of the Monarch MKIII presentation is what I would consider ‘out of whack’.”
Marcus, Headfonics
“There's of course the elevated bass but also the tonality is deliberately colored to work well with the likes of Asian pop and acoustic jazz.”
VSG, TechPowerUp
