HeadphoneOverreview

TANGZU OX Demon King

An IEM brand's first planar headphone: liked for its bass and its metalwork, and heard as warm, as lively V-shaped or as balanced depending on who is listening.

25 sourcesUpdated
$349Typical US price

Score aggregates reviewer opinions across topics.

View product
TANGZU OX Demon King

The short version

What to know.

An open-back 85 mm planar (25 Ω, 92 dB/mW) that wants a little more power than average and is heavy, at 471 g on Headfonics' scale. Sources agree that it is solidly built in machined aluminium, that the bass has more weight than most open planars at the price, and that the soundstage is wider than average. They mostly find it comfortable and energetic, though two reviewers found it too small for a large head. The Chinese-language reviews hear the low end as soft and only moderately deep rather than slamming. Opinion splits three ways on the voicing (warm, lively V-shape or balanced) and on the treble (bright and peaky, lively but clean, or smooth). The midrange is full and rich to some, relaxed to others and hollow to one show listener. On value, most reviewers think it earns its $349, while a minority would buy a HiFiMan instead. All four measurement rigs show a modest low-end lift, a normal-height ear-gain peak at about 3 kHz, a notch at 4 kHz and a lifted band around 8–10 kHz compared with the Edition XV on the same rig. Separately, one reviewer was told by TANGZU and two retailers that replacement pads aren't sold.

About this product

TANGZU's first full-size headphone (牛魔王, "Bull Demon King"), an open-back 85 mm planar released in December 2025. It ships with a single-ended 3.5 mm cable; the silver 4.4 mm "Iron Cudgel" cable was bundled with the first units sold direct and by some dealers at launch. Not TANGZU's later Li Jing headphone.

TANGZU made its name with Tang-dynasty-themed in-ear monitors like the budget Wan'er. The OX Demon King, named for the bull-demon of Journey to the West, is its first over-ear headphone: an open-back planar with an 85 mm driver in machined aluminium cups behind a lattice grille, with leather pads that twist-lock onto the cup. It launched at $349, directly against HiFiMan's Edition XV and Sundara, Meze's 105 AER and Audio-Technica's R70x.

Ten months on, reviewers in English and Chinese broadly like how it is built and how it fills out the low end. They disagree on what it sounds like overall: the largest group hears a warm, full-bodied planar, another a lively V-shape with an energetic top end, and a few call it balanced. Four measurement rigs help explain why.

A good fit for

  • Listeners who want planar speed with more bass weight than a HiFiMan, without EQ
  • Anyone after a warm-leaning, full-bodied open planar for vocals and pop
  • Buyers who value a metal build and distinctive design at this price
  • People who find HiFiMan's egg-shaped cups uncomfortable and want a round-cup planar

Think twice if

  • You're sensitive to upper-treble sizzle or a peaky lower treble
  • You have a large head (try it first: the headband runs short)
  • You expect to buy factory replacement pads years from now
  • You want a balanced cable or a carry case in the box

The reviewer consensus

Agreement &
disagreement.

4 / 11topics divide opinion
1 Strong agreement6 Mostly agree4 Divided opinions

Common ground5

  • Solid, premium-feeling machined-aluminium build
  • More bass weight than most open planars at the price
  • Wider-than-average soundstage

Points of contention4

  • Overall voicing: warm and full-bodied vs lively V-shape vs balanced
  • Treble: lively but clean vs bright and peaky vs smooth and relaxed
  • Midrange: full and rich vs relaxed or pulled back (and hollow to one show listener)

A closer listen.

11 topics · 4 divided
Left: criticalRight: positiveTighter lines: more agreement

Bass

PositiveMostly agree
Reviewer sentiment14 supporting sources
CriticalNeutralPositive

Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average

Generally praised for weight and punch, and English-language reviewers mostly call it deep and physical for an open planar. The Chinese-language reviews describe it differently: ample in quantity but softer in impact, with extension that stops short.

“there is a healthy mid-bass presence with good punch, impact, and energy, along with good tightness, detail, and texture.”

Headfonics (Marcelo)

“只是无法达到拳拳到头的夯实感”

铁西迟之谦 (Zhihu; Chinese — "it just can't reach a solid, punch-after-punch impact")

Measured

All four rigs show planar-flat extension to 20 Hz and the 50–100 Hz region about 2–3 dB above the midrange, where the same rigs' HiFiMan Edition XV sits level or slightly below. That is a modest lift, not a big bass shelf.

Link to this topic

The hardware

Specifications.

Checked

Design

Type
Open-back over-ear
Drivers
1 × 85 mm planar magnetic
Housing
Aluminum Alloy

Electrical

Impedance
25 Ω
Sensitivity
92 dB/mW≈ 108 dB/V
Frequency response
10 Hz – 40 kHz

Connection

Cable
Detachable, dual-entry, 2 mcommunity-sourced: cable entry
Plugs supplied
3.5 mm

Physical

Released
2025-12

Manufacturer-published figures, not measurements · from tangzu.net, tangzu.net. Cable entry not published by the maker — community-sourced from hands-on reviews: headfonics.com, youtube.com.

Follow the evidence

Sources 25

1–6 of 25 sources

Read with context

Limitations & method.

As of

What to keep in mind 7

  1. A read of where reviews stand as of October 2026. This is a young headphone, and most of its reviews were written with units lent or sent by TANGZU or its dealers.

  2. There isn't yet a meaningful pool of owner star ratings to lean on.

Where to buy Product & retailer links