Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split, though not evenly. Most reviewers and owners describe a converter that adds nothing — neutral, detailed, uncoloured — and the bought-unit benches agree. A minority hears that accuracy as flat and uninvolving next to DACs voiced to flatter; and Amazona's reviewer went further, calling the presentation gilded rather than truly neutral and rating it very good but not a reference.
Measured
Archimago's bench of a bought unit found six well-behaved reconstruction filters with no intersample overload, linearity holding to about -135 dBFS in a DAC-to-ADC loopback, and very low distortion and crosstalk with precise channel matching; RME publishes -115 dB THD+N at the XLR outputs (SNR 120 dB unweighted, 124 dBA). Archimago notes that some DACs measure lower THD+N still, while judging this one beyond what human hearing can resolve. The ADC (AK5574, 768 kHz, DSD256 recording) benched marginally quieter than the earlier Pro FS's.
vs. listeners — Amazona's loopback plots showed rising high-frequency distortion and phase deviation; a reader's control bench published by Amazona three weeks later (two independent measurement setups) reproduced neither and traced the phase plot to an uncompensated reference point. The dissenting listening verdict stands as a preference; the measurements behind it did not survive the re-test.
“From what I'm hearing over the last month, this DAC simply "gets out of the way".”
Archimago, Archimago's Musings
“Sehr gut: ja – Referenz: nein.”
Markus Schroeder, Amazona.de (German: "Very good: yes — reference: no.")
