Keybed
Contested · 8 srcThe headline disagreement, and it is about feel rather than facts. Reviewers who rate it place the semi-weighted action among the best at this price and value that M-Audio kept semi-weighted keys at 61 keys where rivals switch to synth-action; players who dislike it describe the same action as sprung and springy, tiring after a short session. Everyone agrees the keys are light and shallower than a piano's, and that there is no aftertouch.
M-Audio specs 61 full-size, velocity-sensitive, semi-weighted keys with no aftertouch of any kind, and there is no velocity-curve selection on the unit itself — any curve shaping has to happen in the DAW. Sound On Sound, reviewing the 88-key sibling, classes the same action as sprung rather than weighted and notes audible spring noise. Owners of the 88 additionally report a velocity floor (nothing below 15 however softly you play) and a black-versus-white key velocity imbalance that also circulates widely about the 61.
⚠ vs. listeners — Both camps are describing the same mechanism. The action is officially semi-weighted but behaves like a sprung one, so whether that reads as 'pleasantly resistant' or 'springy and tiring' depends largely on what you played before — the reviewers coming from synth-action minis rate it highly, the ones coming from piano or hammer actions do not. The black-key velocity complaint is widely repeated but thinly evidenced for the 61 specifically: the fullest first-hand reports are from the 88 MK3 and the older MK2.
“the semi-weighted keys of the 88 and 61-key versions are amongst the best you can buy in the price range”
Higher Hz
“the MK3 keys feel vaguely spring-loaded, and after about 15 minutes of playing, I found my fingers feeling fatigued from pressing hard enough to counteract that”
RichieWitch · KVR Audio
