Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split three ways. The largest group, led by Wirecutter's blind panel, TechRadar and Jay's iyagi (desktop), hears it as full, natural and even warm — 'not bright whatsoever', Jay says, against the RP-600M. Hi-Fi World, Audio Advice and several owners hear the classic forward, lively Klipsch sound and like it. A smaller group of owners, mostly at a desk or close up, find it bright and scooped: harsh treble, recessed vocals, tiring after a while. Several fixed it by aiming the horns away, flipping the speakers or adding a subwoofer.
Measured
Hi-Fi World measured a lift of a few dB around 4 kHz, still there 20° off axis, and strong treble up to 12 kHz. Below 1 kHz the output slopes down to −5 dB at 60 Hz, which the magazine says will leave it 'lacking in warmth' unless placed near a rear wall in a smallish room. With Dynamic Bass EQ on at low volume it measured +5 dB at 70 Hz.
vs. listeners — The one measurement backs the 'forward' camp more than the 'warm' one. The warm reports may reflect Dynamic Bass EQ, which lifts the bass at low and moderate volume, and boundary gain on desks and shelves. Hi-Fi World itself heard vocals 'pushed right out' with 'almost a glare'. The bright reports cluster around desk distances with the horns aimed straight at the listener.
“Everyone agreed it had a reasonably full and natural sound, but all said they’d prefer a little more bass.”
Brent Butterworth, Wirecutter (four-person blind panel, speakers on stands)
“The KLIPSCH R-51PM loudspeakers measured well, having a forward upper midband that will make them sound vivid.”
Noel Keywood, Hi-Fi World (measured review)
“The klipsch completely gut the midrange and vocals sound recessed.”
Astro_gli, r/BudgetAudiophile (owner; returned them for the Kanto YU6)
