Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split: most hear the midrange as natural and rich, a minority as coloured. Every rig finds the ear-gain peak shifted up to about 3.5–3.7 kHz. The larger camp hears that as harmless character. The minority agrees something is off but not on which way it leans: some hear the midrange as thin or slightly recessed, others as too forward or muffled in the upper mids. They are describing the same measured shift.
Measured
Nine rigs, one finding. Against the same rig's HD 600, the peak sits at 3.61 vs 3.31 kHz on oratory1990's GRAS, 3.61 vs 3.25 kHz on Kuulokenurkka's coupler, 3.59 vs 3.44 kHz on Earphones Archive's B&K 5128 and 3.71 vs 3.32 kHz on listener's 5128; boizoff, Capra Audio and GadgetryTech land at 3.36–3.65 kHz, and SoundGuys reads 'a narrower spike' centred at 3.7 kHz. Against Harman 2018, oratory1990's data is about 1.8 dB short at 2.5 kHz and 3.5 dB over at 3.5 kHz. Resolve calls it 'the shifted ear gain that can come across as a 3.5khz peak' and hears it 'as more of a timbre feature than anything fatiguing or glaring'.
vs. listeners — The dissent points in two directions — listener calls the midrange 'slightly thinned', ProfSnipe on Reddit hears the upper mids as if under 'a thick blanket', while a Head-Fi owner comparing it with the Elex found the mids too forward. A dip just below the peak and a lift just above it can read either way, and both camps are reacting to the same measured shape.
“This combined with warmth injected by the mid-bass bump gives the midrange of the Hadenys a natural, realistic presentation.”
Headfonics (Thomas)
“There is slight harshness at 3.5 kHz, so the timbre is not perfectly natural”
Kuulokenurkka (Headphone Corner)
