Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split, and the split is between the ears and the rigs. Most launch reviewers hear an even, near-neutral tuning with a touch of warmth. Every measurement and most post-launch critics hear a bass-forward, V-leaning voicing a long way from any target — fun to some, wrong to others. The reconciling fact is mechanical: the driver sits low in the earcup, so seating changes the response.
Measured
RTINGS reads Sound Signature “Boosted Bass”, Bass “Very Emphasized (7 dB)” and Treble “Slightly Underemphasized (-3 dB)”. Three squig rigs agree on the shape: Kuulokenurkka puts 60–200 Hz +7 to +8 dB above Harman 2018 (+8.5 dB over its own HD 600), GadgetryTech +5 dB with ANC on and +7 dB off, DHRME +7 dB over its HD 600 — each with a presence dip around 3–6 kHz and a rebound above 6 kHz. Les Numériques' lab describes the same thing in words: bass and treble both too pronounced, the result “objectivement loin d’être un modèle de transparence”. RecordingNOW calls them “the most V-shaped” of B&W's current range.
vs. listeners — Both camps can be honest. SoundGuys found that “the main culprit behind divergent ranges of emphasis is the decision to put the drivers of the headphones in the lower part of the ear cup” and warned that outlets would disagree; RTINGS says the response “can yield a different sound between wears”. Kuulokenurkka's four seatings of one sample move the 3–6 kHz band from −0.3 to −6 dB against target, and two rigs even disagree on whether it is bassier than the Sony WH-1000XM6. A reviewer whose pair seals and seats one way hears balance; a rig, or an owner seated another way, gets the shelf.
“Tonally, they’re really nicely judged – even and pretty much neutral”
TechRadar (Simon Lucas)
“depending on your tastes, the bass-heavy tuning may appeal to you.”
RTINGS
