MIDI ControllerOverreview

Behringer X-Touch

Nine motorised faders for the price of one good plug-in — and a decade-old argument about whether the buttons that do nothing are the box's fault or your DAW's.

10 sourcesUpdated
$419Typical US price

Score aggregates reviewer opinions across topics.

Check price on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Behringer X-Touch

The short version

What to know.

A full-size, nine-fader DAW control surface built around 100 mm touch-sensitive motorised faders, eight LCD scribble strips, eight endless encoders with LED collars, 92 illuminated buttons, a jog/shuttle wheel and per-channel eight-segment meters. Around $419 in the US (£249 at Thomann) it is widely treated as the cheapest credible way to put a real motorised fader bank on the desk, and sources agree on the frame: the chassis is heavy and solid, the connectivity is unusually generous for the class (USB, 5-pin DIN MIDI in and out, Ethernet for RTP MIDI or direct control of Behringer's X-Air and X32 mixers, a two-port USB hub, and three pedal jacks), and the metering and internally-lit buttons improve on the Mackie unit it emulates. They agree on the hard edges too: the box is thick rather than slim, so the scribble strips sit at an angle that is hard to read seated; the jog wheel is the weakest-feeling part; the multi-coloured displays in the promotional photos only light up in colour when driving a Behringer mixer, not a DAW; and there is no generic MIDI mode, no editor and no software bundle — the box holds the unit and two cables. Two things genuinely divide sources. First, the faders: one camp reports them smooth and silent, another reports clatter, judder and faders that resist a finger — and the set documents three different causes, only one of which is the hardware. Second, integration: everyone finds that behaviour varies by DAW, but they split on whether that is the Mackie protocol's limitation or the product's failing.

About this product

The full-size X-Touch Universal Control Surface: nine 100 mm touch-sensitive motorised faders, eight LCD scribble strips, eight encoders with LED collars, 92 illuminated buttons, a jog wheel, and USB/MIDI/Ethernet. Not the smaller X-Touch Compact (a generic MIDI controller with a partial Mackie mode), the single-fader X-Touch One, the knob-and-button X-Touch Mini, or the fader-only X-Touch Extender sidecar.

For most of the 2000s a motorised fader bank meant a Mackie Control Universal, and the MCU meant real money. Behringer's answer arrived in 2015: the same nine-fader layout, the same Mackie Control protocol, scribble strips and an eight-segment meter on every channel — at a fraction of the price. It has been the default recommendation for a first control surface ever since, and it also does something no Mackie does: plug an Ethernet cable into a Behringer X-Air or X32 mixer and the same box becomes a live console surface.

That inheritance is also the catch. The X-Touch speaks MCU and HUI and nothing else — there is no user-programmable MIDI mode on the full-size model — so what the surface actually does is decided by how well your DAW implements a protocol designed in the 1990s. Ten years of reviews, forum threads and owner reports circle that one fact from both directions.

A good fit for

  • Logic and Cubase users, whose DAWs implement Mackie Control most fully and where the printed labels mostly mean what they say
  • Anyone who wants a full motorised fader bank on the cheapest credible terms and can live with banking eight channels at a time
  • Owners of a Behringer X-Air or X32, who get a live console surface and a DAW controller in the same box over one Ethernet cable
  • Desks with limited depth — it is the most compact of the nine-fader surfaces it competes with
  • People who want a hardware fallback: three separate routes to the computer, and replacement faders sold as spares

Think twice if

  • You mix in Pro Tools and want more than faders and transport — the HUI path has no plug-in control whatsoever
  • You want to reassign buttons or send your own CCs; the full-size model has no user-definable MIDI mode and no editor (look at the X-Touch Compact instead)
  • You routinely work past about forty tracks, where scrolling a fixed eight-fader window stops saving time
  • You need to read track names at a glance while seated and won't prop or rake the unit
  • You were buying it for the colour-coded scribble strips shown in the marketing photos — those need a Behringer mixer, not a DAW
  • You want a bus-powered controller for a laptop bag

The reviewer consensus

Agreement &
disagreement.

2 / 7topics divide opinion
2 Strong agreement3 Mostly agree2 Divided opinions

Common ground10

  • Nine 100 mm touch-sensitive motorised faders, eight encoders, 92 lit buttons and a jog wheel for a fraction of what the Mackie Control Universal it emulates costs — the value case is close to unanimous
  • The chassis is heavy and metal, plants itself on the desk, and owners reporting years of use say nothing has broken
  • Connectivity is unusually generous: USB, 5-pin DIN MIDI in and out, Ethernet for RTP MIDI or direct control of a Behringer X-Air/X32 mixer, a two-port USB hub, and three pedal jacks

Points of contention5

  • How the motorised faders behave: smooth and silent for some, clattery, jumpy or actively resisting a finger for others — with three different causes documented (the DAW's Mackie update rate, the touch sensor reading only the concave dip of the cap, and outright unit faults)
  • Whether the buttons that do nothing in your DAW are the product's failing or the Mackie/HUI protocol's limitation — everyone agrees behaviour varies by DAW, and nobody agrees on who to blame
  • Whether relying on a 1990s control protocol in a current product is acceptable pragmatism or a reason to skip it entirely

A closer look.

7 topics · 2 divided
Left: criticalRight: positiveTighter lines: more agreement

Integration

Leans positiveDivided opinions
Reviewer sentiment6 supporting sources
CriticalNeutralPositive

Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average

Sources split — not on what happens, but on who to blame for it. The X-Touch is a Mackie Control Universal emulation with a HUI mode bolted on, so what each button does is decided by the DAW at the other end. Logic and Cubase implement MCU most fully and are where the labels printed on the surface mostly mean what they say; Ableton Live and Reason are extensive but remap whole button clusters; Pro Tools runs over HUI and loses the intelligent rotary mappings and plug-in control entirely. One camp reads this as a protocol fact and configures around it: a forum regular points out that Cubase ships two different MCU modes, and that the original Mackie has the very same labelling mismatch — which is why Mackie sold per-DAW overlays. The other camp reads it as a product that arrives half-working, with whole rows of buttons doing nothing and no way to reassign them. Behringer's own support line settles the mechanism without settling the argument: the unit is HUI or MC, and the functionality depends on your DAW's implementation of those.

Measured

Behringer documents two protocols and no third: Mackie Control and HUI, selected at power-on, plus a proprietary Xctrl mode for X-Air/X32 mixers from firmware 1.15. There is no user-definable MIDI mode on the full-size X-Touch — Sound On Sound lists that as a con, and the Compact is the model that offers one. Behringer's own support desk, quoted verbatim in the Steinberg thread, states: “The X-Touch can be set as HUI or MC. So, the functionality actually depends on the HUI/MC implementation protocol of your chosen DAW.”

vs. listeners — The product page promises the unit “will work seamlessly with all compatible music production software” on the strength of HUI and Mackie Control support. The same maker's support desk says functionality depends on your DAW's implementation of those protocols, and Sound On Sound found the HUI path — the only one Pro Tools can use — carries no plug-in control whatsoever. Both statements are true: the protocols connect everywhere, and constrain the workflow everywhere they connect.

Where it splits
It is a faithful, cheap MCU clone — set it up and it behaves like the Mackie; the friction belongs to the protocol and your DAW66%

“Once configured, the X-Touch works with Logic pretty much exactly like an MCU.”

Simon Sherbourne, Sound On Sound
The labels lie and whole button clusters do nothing in your DAW — leaning on a 1990s protocol shows, and you cannot reassign your way out34%

“Overall my few gripes are mainly over buttons not doing what they are assigned to do.”

Chriscc123, Steinberg Forums
Link to this topic

The hardware

Specifications.

Checked

Playing surface

Encoders
8 endless
Faders
9 motorized
Display
LCD

Connection

MIDI
DIN in, DIN out
Pedal inputs
Footswitch
Power
Mains (internal PSU)

Physical

Weight
4,300 g
Dimensions
452 × 301 × 100 mm

Manufacturer-published figures, not measurements · from behringer.com, thomannmusic.com, cdn.mediavalet.com (archived).

Follow the evidence

Sources 10

1–6 of 10 sources

Read with context

Limitations & method.

As of

What to keep in mind 6

  1. This is a read of where the reviews land as of August 2026, and this product has been on sale since 2015 — the coverage spans a full decade, so weigh the recent voices for how it behaves today and the older ones for how it was received.

  2. How much of the surface actually works for you is decided more by your DAW than by anything about the box, so pay most attention to sources using the software you use.

Where to buy Product & retailer links

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.