Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split: most describe a balanced, neutral-leaning tuning that's good enough to track and monitor on — Sonarworks ranked it among the most neutral closed-backs it had measured. A smaller group says it simply isn't flat: the missing low bass and the hole around 5 kHz colour it enough that mix decisions in those ranges go wrong, and a few listeners found it thin or 'like an old radio'.
Measured
Sonarworks placed it among the seven most neutral closed-backs it had measured, with the upper-mid cut and treble boost held to about 5 dB each. Against the Harman 2018 target on oratory1990's GRAS rig it still deviates by about −10 dB at 20 Hz and −7 to −8 dB across 4–6 kHz.
vs. listeners — Both camps are reading the same curve. Through the midrange it tracks a neutral target closely, which is what the 'balanced' camp hears. At the extremes — sub-bass and the 4–6 kHz region — it doesn't, and those are exactly the ranges the 'can't mix on it' camp names.
“That said, if you want to track a recording, these lend a good impression of what you're listening to.”
RTINGS
“if you wanted them for mixing application I'm going to say they're not accurate enough”
askdrtk (YouTube)
