ZiiGaat Doscinco

Name: ZiiGaat Doscinco
Brand: ZiiGaat

A 10 dB bass shelf with a smooth, early-closing top end — the cheap ticket to basshead sound, if you can live with what it costs everywhere else.

ZiiGaat's $269 five-driver hybrid — two 10 mm polymer-diaphragm dynamic drivers in an isobaric arrangement for the bass, plus a Sonion 26A05 and a Sonion 2354 for the mids and a Knowles 33518 super tweeter, on a 3-way crossover, in a black medical-grade resin shell with a 0.78 mm 2-pin cable (3.5 mm or 4.4 mm, chosen at checkout). NOT the Cincotres — same price, same driver platform, same shell, but a bass-tucked reference tuning — and not the Crescent, Estrella, Arcanis, Odyssey, Horizon, Luna, Arete, Arcadia, Lush, Nuo or Cinno. ZiiGaat's own page carries a stray '2DD + 5BA' subtitle that contradicts its own title and spec table; it is a 2DD+3BA. Impedance is listed both as 11 Ω at 1 kHz and as a 16 Ω resistance, with 104 dB sensitivity — easy to drive either way.

OverreviewIn-Ear Monitor29 sourcesas of 2026-08-05

ZiiGaat arrived at the end of 2023 as Linsoul's in-house in-ear label — a team of OEM engineers stepping out under their own name — and spent 2024 releasing sets faster than anyone could track. The Doscinco (Spanish for two-five, after its two dynamic drivers and three armatures) was the first to really land: $269, two 10 mm woofers stacked in an isobaric pair, and a stated 10 dB bass shelf.

It shipped alongside a twin, the Cincotres — identical price, identical drivers, identical shell, opposite intent: where the Cincotres tucks its bass for a reference tuning, the Doscinco leans all the way in. Reviewers who wanted the bass called it a benchmark; reviewers who wanted everything else called it one-note. The measurements make clear they are describing the same curve.

The overview

The ZiiGaat Doscinco is a $269 2DD+3BA hybrid built around a big, deliberate low end: two 10 mm dynamic drivers in an isobaric arrangement, a Sonion 26A05 and 2354 for the midrange, and a Knowles 33518 tweeter. Four independent measurement rigs agree closely on the shape and confirm ZiiGaat's own claim — roughly an 8–10 dB shelf at 20–50 Hz that is still 6–8 dB up at 100 Hz and only spent by 300 Hz, a normal 7–8 dB ear gain at 2.5–3 kHz, an unusually broad 5–7 dB plateau across 4–6 kHz, and then a real roll-off above 10 kHz. Sources agree on the consequences: this is a bass-first set, it isolates well, it is trivially easy to drive, the shells are light and comfortable for most, imaging and separation hold up better than the tuning suggests, and detail is the price of admission rather than a strength. The top end draws the most consistent single complaint anywhere in the set — reviewers who like it and reviewers who don't both describe it as closing early, short on air and sparkle. Almost everything else is argued. Sources split on whether the low end is a controlled, textured thing or a boomy one that bleeds and masks; on whether the result is best called an L-shape or a warm V/U; on whether vocals stay clean or come back thickened and slightly veiled; on whether the smooth treble is a mercy or a missing octave; and on comfort, where the shells are large and several owners needed tip-rolling or gave up. Two non-sonic flags recur independently of taste: the accessory bundle is widely called poor for the money, and driver flex is reported often enough — with one owner reporting an outright driver failure — that it belongs in the buying decision.

Where they agree

A very large, deep, physically satisfying low end — an 8–10 dB shelf that four independent rigs measure and that every source hears.
The top end closes early: air and sparkle above 10 kHz are measurably rolled off, and reviewers on both sides of the treble argument describe it that way.
Micro-detail is the trade, not the strength — competent for the price, and every source points elsewhere if resolution is the goal.
Imaging and instrument separation hold up better than a bass-first tuning would suggest, including for gaming.
Good passive isolation once sealed, and better still with foams.
Trivially easy to drive from a phone or dongle, though the bass authority arrives only at real volume.
The accessory bundle is poor for $269 — three tip pairs, one foam pair, and a cable most reviewers call cheap.
Driver flex is common enough across independent owners to count on encountering it, and at least one unit failed because of it.

Where they split

Bass control: fast, textured and out of the way (most) vs boomy, bleeding and masking — the shelf is still 6–8 dB up at 100 Hz, so both are on the graph.
What to call the tuning: a bass-led L-shape vs a warm V/U with real 3–8 kHz energy — the weighted split between the two names is dead even.
Midrange: vocals stay clean and full (most) vs husky, thickened and slightly veiled by the warmth.
Treble: a merciful smooth, sibilance-free top end vs a missing octave with no leading-edge bite.
Soundstage: wide and holographic (most) vs intimate, and closing in further on bass-heavy tracks.
Comfort: light and all-day easy vs large, wingless shells that need tip-rolling — and one reviewer returned the set purely over fit.
Volume behaviour: several owners report the 4–6 kHz region sharpening at exactly the level needed to get the bass moving; others hear no such thing.

The verdict, mappedEvery aspect on one axis — criticized to praised. Hover a point for its spread; click to jump.

CriticizedNeutralPraised

By aspect — in detail

Bass

Contested · 14 src

Nobody disputes the quantity — this is basshead territory by design, and the deep rumble is the set's reason to exist. What sources split on is whether it stays under control. The larger camp hears it as fast, textured and clean enough to keep out of the way; a substantial minority hears bleed, boom and masking, and the measured shelf supports them: it is still 6–8 dB up at 100 Hz and does not reach flat until 300 Hz.

Measured

Four independent IEC711-class rigs (AudioAmigo, HBB, Jaytiss, Boizoff), normalised to 1 kHz, put the shelf at +7 to +10 dB at 20–50 Hz, +6 to +8 dB at 100 Hz, +3.5 to +5.6 dB at 150 Hz, +1.8 to +3.1 dB at 200 Hz and level with 1 kHz by 300 Hz. ZiiGaat advertises a 10 dB bass shelf, and that is genuinely what the rigs show — but it is a wide shelf rather than a sub-bass-only one, which is exactly why one camp hears slam and the other hears bleed.

⚠ vs. listeners — Both readings are on the graph. The rumble is real and deep, and so is a mid-bass region that is lifted well past where a tucked tuning would stop — so 'clean and out of the way' and 'it warms and masks the lower mids' are describing the same 100–200 Hz band from opposite sides. Tips barely change it: three different tip sets measured on one rig moved the 20 Hz shelf by less than half a dB.

Where it splits

Huge but controlled — deep, fast and textured, and it never turns into mud.64%

“The bass never sounded muddy, it’s very heavy, rich, and textured so the bass heads will be happy.”
Kinemoss Tech (Alexander)

There is simply too much of it — it bleeds into the mids and reads boomier than the graph does.36%

“The mid-bass has decent texturing and speed, though there is inevitably a degree of mid-bass bleed, which isn't unexpected with such copious bass on tap.”
baskingshark, Head-Fi

Tonality

Contested · 15 src

Everyone hears the same two things — an enormous low end and a top half that closes early — but they reach for opposite names. One camp calls it an L-shape, a bass-led tuning with everything else sitting behind it; the other calls it a warm V or U, pointing at the very real energy between 3 and 8 kHz. The graph carries both readings, which is why the argument never resolves.

Measured

Relative to 1 kHz the curve is up 8–10 dB in the sub-bass, down about 1 dB at 500–800 Hz, then up 7–8 dB at 2.5–3 kHz and 5–7 dB across 4–6 kHz before rolling off above 10 kHz. Measured against a flat line that is unambiguously bass-dominant; measured against the 500–800 Hz dip it is just as clearly a U.

⚠ vs. listeners — The two camps are reading the same graph from different reference points, and the weighted tally between them is dead even. Whether you call the Doscinco warm-L or warm-U depends on whether the bass or the 3–8 kHz region grabs you first.

Where it splits· split roughly even

An L-shape — bass-led and warm, with the rest of the range deliberately behind it.

“Tonally, the Doscinco is a bassy L-shaped beast, with the frequency band skewed to the lower ranges.”
baskingshark, Head-Fi

A warm V or U — both ends lifted, with genuine treble energy holding the balance.

“Super well executed V-Shaped IEM. Wonderful thick bass, good vocals, enough treble sparkle to balance things out.”
Audio Amigo, via IEM Ranking

Mids

Contested · 12 src

The most consistent finding is that vocals survive the bass better than the tuning would predict — they are not buried, and note weight and body are repeatedly praised. But sources divide on what the warmth costs: the larger camp hears a clean, full, unshouty midrange; a real minority hears transparency traded away, with voices coming back thickened, husky and a little veiled. Upper mids are agreed to be forward without being peaky at normal volume.

Measured

Ear gain measures +6.8 to +7.7 dB at 2.5 kHz and +7.0 to +8.2 dB at 3 kHz across the four rigs — a full, ordinary pinna compensation, not a recessed one, which is why vocals stay audible. The lower midrange sits about 1 dB below 1 kHz, with the bass shelf still 2–3 dB up at 200 Hz just underneath it: the measured source of the added warmth and body.

Where it splits

Vocals hold their own — clean, full and unshouty, with far less bleed than expected.66%

“Even if there’s a big amount of bass, there’s a surprisingly low amount of bleed.”
vandung2510, Head-Fi

The bass thickens them — voices come back husky, slightly veiled and set back.34%

“There's some veiling of transparency as a consequence, but this region is lush and thick.”
baskingshark, Head-Fi

Treble

Contested · 12 src

The single most agreed-upon fact in the set is that the top end closes early — every rig measures a roll-off above 10 kHz, and reviewers on both sides describe missing air. Where they part is whether that is a feature. The larger camp calls it smooth, fatigue-free and a gift to treble-sensitive listeners; a substantial minority calls it veiled and short on bite, with cymbals and transients blunted. A separate caveat cuts across both: several owners report the 4–6 kHz region turning sharp once you raise the volume enough to get the bass moving.

Measured

All four rigs show a broad +5 to +7 dB plateau across 4–6 kHz, a dip at 7 kHz and a peak at 8 kHz (+5.6 to +7.4 dB), then a clear decline: −0.6 to −3.0 dB by 10 kHz and −6.3 to −12.7 dB by 16 kHz. Measured on one rig across three tip sets, foam tips flatten the 8 kHz peak from +5.6 dB to +0.7 dB while leaving the bass untouched.

⚠ vs. listeners — There is no contradiction about the air — every rig agrees it rolls off, and both camps hear that. The argument is purely about whether an early roll-off is a fault. The 4–6 kHz plateau explains the third opinion: sitting above a full ear gain, it is measurably enough to bite at volume even on a set most people call dark.

Where it splits

Smooth and safe — no sibilance, no fatigue, and a genuine relief if you are treble-sensitive.59%

“The Doscinco has a darkish treble with an early roll-off. This will be a perfect set for treble-sensitive consumers, with no sibilance or fatigue noted.”
baskingshark, Head-Fi

Rolled off and veiled — the air and the leading-edge bite are simply not there.41%

“The treble extension is lacking some air and it’s a bit veiled according to my preference.”
Kinemoss Tech (Alexander)

Soundstage

Moderate · 11 src

Mostly a strength, with a real dissent. Most sources describe a wide, immersive stage that reaches past the usual in-ear limits — one owner calls the holography and width the set's main virtue. Two dissenters hear the opposite: an intimate presentation that closes in further on bass-heavy material. Height and depth draw less enthusiasm than width from nearly everyone.

“Soundstage wise, i think the Doscinco has a wide sense of stage to it, but with around average width and height”
vandung2510, Head-Fi

“The sound stage width is slightly above average in width, but not very tall or deep.”
Kinemoss Tech (Alexander)

“Soundstage favors intimacy over sheer width, and listeners chasing maximum detail or an analytical presentation may want something brighter.”
GearZillaReviews, Head-Fi

“the major pro is the holography and wideness of the stage”
lucanato, HiFiGuides forum

Imaging

Moderate · 7 src

Rated better than the tuning would suggest. Sources credit accurate placement and solid separation that holds together on busy tracks, and a gaming-focused reviewer rates it good enough for positional audio. The one dissent is comparative rather than absolute: separation and resolution are called merely adequate for the price bracket.

“In technicalities, while not that micro-detailed - this is a function of the darkish treble after all - the Doscinco preserves a good soundstage (in all 3 dimensions), with solid instrument separation.”
baskingshark, Head-Fi

“Despite the bass basically owning the sound, they can still provide a good sense of positioning of sound.”
Berry108, Head-Fi

“Separation & resolution not the best around its price, but enough for what it's going for.”
Jays Audio, via IEM Ranking

Detail

Strong consensus · 9 src

The clearest point of agreement in the whole set, and the clearest trade. Nobody calls the Doscinco resolving; nobody calls it blunt either. Reviewers consistently describe middling micro-detail as the direct consequence of the early treble roll-off, and several name cheaper or same-priced rivals that resolve more. If detail is what you are shopping for, every source points elsewhere.

“The details and micro details are ok, taking into consideration the amount of bass.”
Kinemoss Tech (Alexander)

“It doesn’t give that sparkle factor as other sets and detail retrieval is middling sometimes, but is relaxed and quite safe on sensitive ears.”
Berry108, Head-Fi

“This is a mini Monarch MK 3, U shaped.”
Jaytiss, via IEM Ranking

Measured

IEM Ranking's six-expert roll-up puts the Doscinco at 7.1/10 overall, and the reviewers who grade tuning and technicalities separately consistently mark the second lower — Jaytiss gives tuning a B and technicalities a C+; Jays Audio A+ and A−.

Dynamics

Moderate · 6 src

Fewer sources speak to this directly, but they agree: macro-dynamics and slam are a highlight, micro-dynamics are not. The recurring caveat is that the Doscinco wants volume — the depth and authority everyone praises arrive only when you push it, and at least one owner finds that the same volume makes the upper mids uncomfortable.

“Bass has excellent weight and authority, giving kick drums and bass guitars satisfying impact while remaining controlled and textured.”
GearZillaReviews, Head-Fi

“the Doscinco shows quite good amount of macro dynamics, but not as good in terms of micro dynamics and micro details”
vandung2510, Head-Fi

“If i pump out the volume to hear that bass slam and rumble better then the upper mids become a bit sharp and fatiguing for my ears.”
SlhDub, HiFiGuides forum

Comfort

Contested · 9 src

Genuinely split, and it tracks ear size. Most reviewers call the light resin shells comfortable for hours — one names them among the most comfortable he has worn. But the shells are large and have no rear wing to locate them, several people needed to tip-roll to get a seal at all, the Reddit roll-up lists discomfort over long sessions as its single top complaint, and one owner returned the set purely over fit.

Measured

RedditRecs' roll-up of 26 Reddit impressions scores the Doscinco 69% positive and lists exactly one top con: discomfort during extended use.

Where it splits

Light, smooth and all-day easy once seated.60%

“The Doscinco fits well, and is light. There are no sharp protrusions on the internal aspects, and this translates to great comfort for long listening sessions.”
baskingshark, Head-Fi

Large shells with no wing — fit is fiddly, and it does not work for every ear.40%

“The shells are bigger than your average iem. It doesn’t have the usual rear wings like many other universally fit iem, so to me, the Doscinco does need a bit of wiggle action and play around will several tips to get a decent fit.”
vandung2510, Head-Fi

Isolation

Strong consensus · 3 src

Uncontested, and one of the set's quiet strengths. The sealed resin shell blocks enough outside noise for commuting, offices and noisy rooms, and it improves further with foams or a tip that seals properly.

“Build is solid, with good isolation; this IEM is a suitable option for outdoor usage or noisy environments.”
baskingshark, Head-Fi

“Despite being a universal fitting set, the Doscinco delivers good isolation that can easily drown out noise of the outside world.”
Berry108, Head-Fi

“using Doscinco with the ear tips from Hype 4 provided a much better fit, seal, and isolation”
Kinemoss Tech (Alexander)

Build

Moderate · 10 src

The shells themselves are praised — well-finished black resin, a glittered faceplate, metal nozzles, no sharp edges. Two things drag the score down and both are near-unanimous: the accessory bundle is called poor for $269 (three silicone tips, one pair of foams, a basic cable, a case), and the stock cable is repeatedly described as cheap. The more serious flag is driver flex, reported by multiple independent owners who could not tip-roll it away — usually harmless, but one owner's left driver failed outright inside three weeks.

“For a midFI set, the accessories are seriously lacking.”
baskingshark, Head-Fi

“The quality of the cable reminds me of some cheaper cable from Kbear or Xinhs.”
vandung2510, Head-Fi

“Sadly, with the silicone tips in place, I encountered driver flex on one side of the housings, but this is partially dependent on eartip choice and ear anatomy (the foam tips can attenuate this driver flex).”
baskingshark, Head-Fi

“Same, I have driver flex on both my Doscinco and Cincotres, even after trying many eartips.”
Ljnu, HiFiGuides forum

“listened to it for 2 1/2 weeks and pretty familiar with the sound and one day, driver flex happened, sound became flat, no bass at all”
JoeBukol, HiFiGuides forum

Measured

The box holds the IEMs, a 1.2 m four-core 2-pin cable in your choice of 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm, three pairs of silicone tips, one pair of foams and a zippered case. Linsoul's warranty is one year on the IEM and three months on the cable. One reviewer separately measured the set as shipping in reverse absolute polarity — inaudible for most people, and undone by rotating the 2-pin connectors 180°.

Value

Moderate · 12 src

Broadly seen as a strong buy for what it sets out to do — several reviewers rank its low end at or near the best under $400, and Crinacle's database lists it as approved. The reservations are about fit-of-purpose, not competence: the accessory bundle is thin for the money, its own identically-priced twin the Cincotres serves the opposite taste, and the bracket has moved on since 2024. Street prices now run below list.

“Benchmark bass set before the UP. Low-end is impactful, rumbly, heavy, and slams hard with reverb detail.”
Jays Audio, via IEM Ranking

“lovers of a gargantuan bass that doesn't totally ignore technicalities should check out this basshead fun-sounding hybrid”
baskingshark, Head-Fi

“Currently the best IEM I've ever tried, outstanding soundstage with deep bass and warm tone.”
Paul, Linsoul customer review

Measured

List price is $269 at ZiiGaat, Linsoul and Amazon; Bloom Audio shows $249 and IEM Ranking's Linsoul link $242. IEM Ranking's six-expert roll-up gives 7.1/10 (A Tier), Crinacle's graph database lists it as 'Approved' at $270, Amazon's aggregate is 4.6/5 from 25 ratings and RedditRecs reads 69% positive across 26 Reddit impressions — all small, self-selected samples.

Best for

Bass listeners who want depth and slam first and are happy to pay for it elsewhere
Treble-sensitive listeners who need a set with no sibilance and no fatigue
Hip-hop, R&B, EDM, rock and metal libraries, and immersive gaming or film
Anyone who wants a smooth, forgiving set that flatters poorly-mastered recordings
Buyers who listen at real volume — the authority everyone praises needs it

Skip if

You want air, sparkle or micro-detail — every rig measures the roll-off above 10 kHz and every source hears it
You want a neutral or reference tuning — its identical-price twin, the Cincotres, is the set tuned for that
Your library is vocal-led: a real minority hears voices come back husky and slightly veiled
You judge a set by its box — the accessories and stock cable are widely called poor for $269
Driver flex would bother you, or you can't buy somewhere with an easy return
You have smaller ears or dislike tip-rolling — the shells are large and have no rear wing

At a glance

↳Consensus

73 / 100weighted mean across 29 sources — an aggregate, not a single verdict

↳Type

IEM

↳Sources

29 · 6 classes

↳As of

2026-08-05

↳Owner rating

4.6/5 · 25small, self-selected sample — skews high

Where to buy

Sources29 reviews across 6 classes. Weight reflects expertise × independence; echoes collapsed.

s1ZiiGaat Doscinco showcase review, 3.5/5 (measured on the author's IEC711 coupler)Head-Fi (baskingshark)Editorial2024-05-18w0.80
s2ZiiGaaT Doscinco in-ear monitors review and comparison with ThieAudio Hype 2 / Hype 4Kinemoss Tech (Alexander)Editorialaffiliate2024-05w0.70
s3Bassy wonders - Iem with balance L-shaped tonality (4.5/5)Head-Fi (vandung2510)Editorial2024-05-18w0.70
s4ZiiGat Doscinco's Review - Fun and Rumbly (4/5)Head-Fi (ywheng89)Community2024-04-11w0.60
s5Ziigaat Doscinco Review: Gaat' that bass (5/5)Head-Fi (Berry108)Community2024-04-26w0.55
s6Ziigaat Doscinco - L sounds (2.5/5)Head-Fi (W0lrince)Critical2024-12-22w0.60
s7GearZilla Field Report: ZiiGaat Doscinco (4.5/5)Head-Fi (GearZillaReviews)Community2026-07-08w0.50
s8Ziigaat DosCinco frequency response (REW export)AudioAmigo (audioamigo.squig.link)Measurement2024w0.75
s9Z Doscinco frequency response (REW export)HBB / Bad Guy Good Audio Reviews (hbb.squig.link)Measurement2024w0.75
s10Doscinco frequency response (REW export)Jaytiss (jaytiss.squig.link)Measurement2024w0.70
s11Doscinco frequency response, three tip sets (REW exports)Boizoff (boizoff.squig.link)Measurement2024w0.70
s12Ziigaat Doscinco — 6 expert reviews, 7.1/10 (A Tier)IEM RankingEditorialaffiliate2026w0.60
s13ENDGAME BASS 💎 ZIIGAAT DOSCINCO REVIEWJays Audio (YouTube)Videoaffiliate2024-02-20w0.55
s14ZiiGaat's UNDERRATED Twin, the DoscincoHangout.Audio / Crinacle (YouTube)Videoaffiliate2024-10-15w0.60
s15🔶 ZiiGaat Doscinco — official discussion thread (380 posts)HiFiGuides forumCommunity2024-02 → 2024-08w0.60
s16Owner impressions after two days — bass, treble and driver flexHiFiGuides forum (SlhDub)Critical2024-04-16w0.50
s17"the doscinco is boomiest set by far" — owner comparisonHiFiGuides forum (psykano)Owner2024-03-25w0.40
s18Owner impressions — metal listener on the slamHiFiGuides forum (Marcos_Silva)Owner2024-02-20w0.40
s19Doscinco vs Cincotres — owner comparison on mids and trebleHiFiGuides forum (domq422)Owner2024-03-25w0.45
s20Returned over fit — long-session owner impressionsHiFiGuides forum (lucanato)Owner2024-04-30w0.40
s21Driver failure after 2½ weeks, returned and refundedHiFiGuides forum (JoeBukol)Owner2024-04-20w0.40
s22ZiiGaat Doscinco — owner ratings (4.6/5, 25)Amazon (owner ratings)Owneraffiliate2026w0.40
s23ZiiGaat Doscinco — product page, spec sheet and 7 customer reviewsLinsoulOwneraffiliate2026w0.35
s24What are the Best ZiiGaat IEMs for Me in 2025?Bloom AudioEditorialaffiliate2025w0.35
s25ZiiGaat Doscinco — all Reddit reviews in one place (69% positive of 26)RedditRecsCommunityaffiliate2026-08-05w0.40
s26ZiiGaat Doscinco — official product page and spec sheetZiiGaatOwneraffiliate2026w0.30
s27Crinacle's 5128 graph tool — Doscinco listed "Approved" at $270Hangout.AudioMeasurementaffiliate2026w0.35
s28ZiiGat Doscinco's Review - Fun and Rumbly (author's own blog repost)jaarbywei.blogspot.com (ywheng89)Community2024-04w0.10
s29ZiiGaat Doscinco (IEM): Reviews, Used Pricing, CompetitionExtremeHiFiEditorialaffiliate2025-09-25w0.10

Limitations & method

This is a read of where the reviews land as of August 2026, and most of them were written in 2024 — the $250–$300 bracket has turned over several times since, so treat the rankings as a snapshot rather than a standing verdict.
The one thing you should audition rather than trust is the bass. Sources agree there is a lot of it and disagree about whether it stays clean, and where you land depends on your ears, your seal and how loud you listen.
How much treble you hear depends heavily on tips: swapping to foams measurably flattens the 8 kHz peak while leaving the bass alone, so a set that sounds too sharp or too dull may just need a different tip.
Fit matters more here than on most IEMs — the shells are large and have no rear wing, and a loose seal thins the low end and changes the whole balance. Several owners had to tip-roll before the set made sense.
Driver flex comes up often enough from independent owners that it is worth buying somewhere with a friendly return policy; it is usually only a clicking noise on insertion, but one owner's driver did fail.
Owner star ratings come from people who chose to buy it, so they skew high, and the samples here are small — a couple of dozen on Amazon and single digits on the retailer's own page. Weigh the written impressions over the averages.
The measurements come from independent enthusiast rigs rather than a big lab, so read the tonal notes as a well-corroborated sketch rather than a certified curve. That four separate rigs agree this closely is the reassuring part.
Its twin, the Cincotres, costs the same and uses the same drivers with the opposite tuning, so any comparison you read may be arguing about which one you want rather than about quality.
Prices have drifted below list — the maker's own store shows it sold out while retailers list it between roughly $240 and $269 — so shop around before paying the sticker.

Consensus-of-sources synthesis · as of 2026-08-05 · not a measurement verdict or ground truth.