Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
The first fault line. Everyone hears a broadly balanced set with mild coloration and no obvious V-shape — but the label splits in two. A larger camp hears it as smooth, warm-leaning and midrange/vocal-forward (mature, musical, relaxed); a smaller camp hears a bright-neutral, slightly analytical, clarity-first set. The objective read sits between: 'smoother than Harman,' sub-bass shelf, moderate ear gain, a treble dip — which is exactly why brightness is a relative call.
Measured
Hawaii Bad Boy's rig (hbb.squig.link), read relative to 1 kHz, shows a ~+4.5 dB sub-bass shelf, a leaner mid-bass (about −2 dB at 200–500 Hz), a moderate ear-gain peak (~+5.4 dB at 2.5 kHz, +4.7 dB at 3 kHz) and a −2.2 dB dip near 6 kHz — an objectively 'smoother-than-Harman' balance. ASR's Human Bass reads the same graphs the same way.
vs. listeners — The graph is a mild sub-bass-lifted, gently-relaxed-treble balance — which each side describes with opposite words: the moderate (not aggressive) ear gain and 6 kHz dip read as 'smooth/warm/vocal-forward' to one camp and, because it sits below a Harman-bright target, as 'bright-neutral but not shouty' to the other. Both are describing the same tilt.
“It finds a proper middle ground between a neutral reference style and brighter vocal tuning, giving just enough energy without ever becoming sharp or harsh.”
Headfonics (Kurt)
“The Arcanis leans toward a bright-neutral tuning with just a hint of warmth.”
Nextrift (Jin Soh)
