DAC / AmpOverreview

Topping DX5 II

One of the best-measuring boxes ever sold for $299 — and the one thing reviewers cannot settle is whether yours will keep working.

87/ 100
Review score
18 sourcesUpdated
$299Typical US price

Score aggregates reviewer opinions across topics.

Check price on Amazon As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Topping DX5 II

The short version

What to know.

A compact desktop DAC, headphone amplifier and preamp, $299, with an internal power supply and no external brick. On the bench it is exceptional: Audio Science Review measured SINAD of roughly 122.8 dB and THD+N of 0.000072% at the balanced line output, placing it inside ASR's top twenty best-measuring DACs ever tested, and 5.9 watts into 33 ohms from the balanced headphone output — enough that reviewers ran out of nerve before the amplifier ran out of headroom. Noise is very low, though not class-leading: 91 dB signal-to-noise at a 50 mV output, a few dB behind the quietest amplifiers measured, and no reviewer heard hiss with sensitive in-ears. The feature list is the other reason people buy it — ten bands of parametric EQ stored in hardware and applied to every input, separate profiles per output, LDAC Bluetooth, a remote, 12 V triggers, three headphone jacks and a colour screen that gets consistent praise. Two things are genuinely argued about. The first is whether it has a sound: the measurements say no, but a real cluster of listeners describes a lean, bright top end, and one describes the exact opposite. The second, and more consequential, is reliability. From late 2025 a repeating failure appears across Head-Fi, Reddit and the ASR forums — the 4.4 mm and XLR balanced outputs distorting or losing a channel while the 6.35 mm jack keeps working — and at least one repair that had to go back to the factory to be fixed. Plenty of owners have had no trouble at all. The single-ended output is also about a third the power of the balanced one, which explains most of the disagreement about drive.

About this product

The second-generation DX5, launched June 2025: dual ES9039Q2M converters in place of the original DX5's dual ES9068AS, Topping's new triple-stage X-Hybrid amplifier in place of the NFCA modules, a 2-inch colour Aurora screen, and 10-band hardware parametric EQ driven from the Topping Tune desktop app. Not the original DX5 (which launched at $449), not the smaller DX1 II, not the DX9 flagship, and not the two-box D50 III + L50 stack. Black, white and silver are the same unit; Amazon lists each finish under a separate ASIN.

Topping has spent fifteen years making the same argument in different enclosures: that a converter and an amplifier are engineering problems with correct answers, and that the correct answers keep getting cheaper. The DX5 II is that argument at its most compressed — a 945-gram aluminium slab the size of a hardback, holding two ESS converters, a fully balanced headphone amplifier good for nearly six watts, ten bands of parametric EQ running on the device itself, LDAC Bluetooth, a preamp stage and a two-inch colour screen that will draw you a VU meter if you want one.

It replaced a $449 predecessor at $299, and the reviews that followed were close to unanimous. What came next was less tidy: a slow accumulation of owner reports, across three separate forums, of balanced outputs that distort or drop a channel — and at least one repair that had to go back to the factory to be fixed. Both halves of that story are in here.

A good fit for

  • Anyone who wants parametric EQ in hardware, applied to every input including Bluetooth, with profiles stored on the device and separate settings per output
  • Hungry planars and high-impedance dynamics driven from the balanced outputs, where the measured headroom is genuinely large
  • Sensitive-IEM listeners who want a silent background plus exact channel balance at very low volume
  • Desks that also feed powered speakers - the RCA and XLR line outputs switch between fixed and preamp and keep their own volume and EQ memory
  • People who want one box with no external power brick, a remote, LDAC Bluetooth and 12 V triggers on a small footprint
  • Buyers who care what the bench says: this is one of the best-measuring DACs ever tested at any price, let alone $299

Think twice if

  • You need the unit to be serviceable where you live - the documented fix for the known balanced-output fault is a factory return, and shipping it back is on you
  • You will mostly use the 6.35 mm single-ended jack with demanding headphones: that output measures roughly a third the power of the balanced one
  • You want a set-and-forget box - getting the best from it means keeping firmware current and doing the EQ setup in a desktop app
  • Your headphones are already lively at the top and you do not want to EQ - several reviewers found the treble unforgiving on bright transducers
  • You want USB-C, a 3.5 mm jack, aptX Lossless, or a remote that feels like it cost anything
  • You buy from a retailer with a short return window - the reported failures have surfaced days to months in, not out of the box

The reviewer consensus

Agreement &
disagreement.

2 / 7topics divide opinion
2 Strong agreement3 Mostly agree2 Divided opinions

Common ground9

  • Measurably outstanding: SINAD around 122.8 dB and THD+N of 0.000072% at the balanced output, inside Audio Science Review's top twenty best-measuring DACs ever tested
  • Genuinely powerful on the balanced outputs - 5.9 watts measured into 33 ohms, and 1 watt into 300 ohms that matches the claimed figure almost exactly
  • Output impedance below a tenth of an ohm, so it damps low-impedance loads without altering their response

Points of contention6

  • Reliability: a repeating balanced-output failure documented across Head-Fi, Reddit and the ASR forums, with the manufacturer's fix requiring a factory return - against plenty of owners running both balanced jacks for months with no trouble
  • Whether it has a sound: near-perfect measurements and a camp that hears nothing added, against a camp that hears a lean, bright top end, against one reviewer who hears the exact opposite - smoothed and laid-back
  • How much power it really has: enormous on the balanced outputs by measurement, but a third of that single-ended, and one reviewer reports it playing quieter than the numbers imply on hard loads

A closer listen.

7 topics · 2 divided
Left: criticalRight: positiveTighter lines: more agreement

Power

PositiveMostly agree
Reviewer sentiment8 supporting sources
CriticalNeutralPositive

Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average

Enormous from the balanced outputs, ordinary from the single-ended one — and almost every disagreement about drive traces to which jack the reviewer used. Audio Science Review measured 5.9 watts into 33 ohms from the balanced output and annotated it "sensational", against 1.8 watts from the 6.35 mm jack on the same load; into 300 ohms the split is 1 watt versus a quarter of a watt. That balanced figure essentially matches what Topping claims, and reviewers running planars, high-impedance dynamics and sensitive in-ears all report the same thing: headroom to spare on the 4.4 mm and XLR outs, with low gain enough for most IEMs. The dissent is narrow and consistent. Audiophile-Heaven, which lists limited drive as its only criticism, found HIFIMAN Susvara Unveiled a struggle and the high-impedance Sivga Peng slightly beyond comfortable, and describes an unusual behaviour where the unit sounds quieter than its power figures suggest. A Head-Fi owner running planars found the single-ended jack short of what they wanted — which the 1.8 W measurement predicts exactly.

It is amazing to see so much power coming out of this little box.

Amir · Audio Science Review

It has heaps of headroom ready at your disposal. For this price, the available power is remarkable.

Yagiz · Headfonia

The DX5 II produces just around the same amount of power as Topping’s L70 separate headphone amplifier, which is rated at 7.6W maximum, which is considerable for the price tag and the size of the DX5 II.

Louis · Headfonics

This is more than enough power to drive even the most demanding headphones on the market, from high-impedance studio monitors to power-hungry planar magnetic designs.

Jerome O'Flaherty · Pragmatic Audio

Not the highest driving power out there for headphones, even for the balanced headphone output

Audiophile-Heaven

since i use planars i find the power output for that port a bit lacking

gvainola · Head-Fi

Measured

Audio Science Review, on an Audio Precision analyzer: 5.9 W into a 33 Ω load from the balanced output and 1.8 W from the single-ended output; 1 W balanced and 0.25 W single-ended into 300 Ω; distortion stays clean down to a 12 Ω load. Topping claims 6400 mW x2 into 32 Ω and 990 mW x2 into 300 Ω balanced, 2200 mW and 250 mW single-ended, with output impedance below 0.10 Ω and two gain settings (balanced 14.6 dB low, 24.7 dB high). The measured 300 Ω figures land on the claimed ones almost exactly; the 33 Ω reading is a fraction under the 32 Ω claim, as the heavier load predicts.

vs. listeners — One reviewer of the nine describes the DX5 II as drawing more current before it raises voltage, so that it plays quieter than its wattage implies and cannot drive the hardest loads. Nothing in the published gain structure or the measured output supports a mechanism like that, and no other source reports it — but the underlying observation, that the single-ended jack is roughly a third the power of the balanced one, is real and measured.

Link to this topic

Follow the evidence

Sources 18

1–6 of 18 sources

Read with context

Limitations & method.

As of

What to keep in mind 6

  1. A read of where the reviews land as of August 2026 - the budget desktop DAC/amp field moves fast, and the balanced-output reports are still accumulating rather than settled.

  2. Nobody has published a failure rate. What exists is a repeating pattern across several forums, and at least one repair that had to go back to the factory - which tells you the fault is real, but not how likely it is to be yours.

Where to buy Product & retailer links

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.