In-Ear MonitorOverreview

TANGZU Wan'er S.G II

The default first IEM got a better cable, a new shell and a box of Sancai tips — and a brighter top end that splits the hobby on whether it is still the Wan'er they loved.

51 sourcesUpdated
$18Typical US price

Score aggregates reviewer opinions across topics.

Check price on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
TANGZU Wan'er S.G II

The short version

What to know.

An $18 single-dynamic-driver IEM that twenty-five measurement rigs agree is a mild, vocal-forward take on Harman: a moderate sub-bass shelf, an ear-gain peak at 2–2.5 kHz, a dip from 3 to 7 kHz, and more upper treble than the target. Against the original Wan'er on the same rigs it is almost the same earphone — bass and mids within about 1 dB — with 2–5 dB more energy above 10 kHz. Sources broadly agree that the accessories carry the value: the Sancai tips and the cable are worth much of the price, imaging is good for the money, and the soundstage is about average. Bass is the mildest complaint — clean and controlled, but most find it lighter than the original and nobody calls it a basshead set. The real arguments are about the top half. Treble splits between smooth and inoffensive and bright, sharp or harsh; the vocals split between clear and forward and shouty; and the overall tuning splits between a balanced all-rounder and a brighter step back from the first Wan'er. Comfort divides on ear size — light and ergonomic for some, a large shell with a short nozzle that will not seal for others — and build divides between a real upgrade and a tail of fragile shells, quiet channels and failing Type-C cables, which measure as a brighter tuning too. A strong starter package, then, whose sound now has as many sceptics as fans.

About this product

The standard second-generation Wan'er S.G (2025): an $18 single 10 mm PET dynamic-driver IEM (19 Ω, flat 0.78 mm 2-pin socket) in white, black or blue, sold with a 3.5 mm, 4.4 mm, 3.5 mm-with-mic or Type-C-with-mic cable and bundled with Tang Sancai Balanced tips. Not the 2023 original Wan'er S.G, not the Bass Version (Lion Edition, the 'Red Lion', covered separately), and not the Headphone Zone x TANGZU edition; the Jade Dragon and Amethyst Dragon colourways share this tuning.

TANGZU's original Wan'er S.G was the hobby's standard 'first IEM' answer for two years: a warm, vocal-forward single dynamic driver for about $20. The Wan'er S.G II arrived in March 2025 as the refresh — a redesigned shell, a flush 2-pin socket in place of the old raised one, a nicer silver-plated cable and, the headline for many buyers, a full set of TANGZU's own Tang Sancai tips in the box, at the same price.

It sits in the most crowded corner of the market, against the 7Hz Zero:2, Moondrop Chu II, Truthear Gate and GK Kunten. What follows is a read of some fifty sources — twenty-five measurement rigs, the Head-Fi and YouTube reviewers, Reddit, and about a thousand verified-buyer reviews — on what the update actually changed, and whether it is still the safe recommendation its predecessor was.

A good fit for

  • First-IEM buyers who want a complete, easy-to-drive package with good tips and a decent cable in the box
  • Vocal-led listening — pop, singer-songwriter and female vocals in particular
  • Listeners who want the Tang Sancai tips anyway and see the earphone as a bonus
  • Owners of the original Wan'er who liked its tuning but wanted a better cable, socket and finish

Think twice if

  • You want real bass weight or slam — it is lighter than the original Wan'er and nobody calls it a basshead set
  • You are sensitive to upper-mid or treble energy — the vocals can read shouty and the top octave bright
  • You have small ears or struggle with short nozzles — fit is the most common owner complaint after the cable
  • You were going to buy the Type-C version — it measures brighter and carries most of the reliability complaints
  • You already own the original Wan'er S.G — the sound barely moved

The reviewer consensus

Agreement &
disagreement.

5 / 11topics divide opinion
1 Strong agreement4 Mostly agree5 Divided opinions1 Limited evidence

Common ground6

  • A mild, vocal-forward V on Harman lines: a moderate sub-bass shelf, a 2–2.5 kHz ear-gain peak, a 3–7 kHz dip and a lifted top octave — twenty-five measurement rigs agree within about 1 dB below 6 kHz.
  • Against the original Wan'er it is nearly the same earphone: bass and mids within about 1 dB on the same rigs, with 2–5 dB more energy from 10 to 16 kHz.
  • The accessories carry the value — a full set of Tang Sancai tips and a better cable are worth much of the price.

Points of contention6

  • Treble: smooth and inoffensive vs bright, sharp or harsh — the Type-C version measures brighter and draws most of the harsh reports.
  • Mids: clear, forward vocals that lead the class vs shouty or coarse upper mids.
  • Overall tuning: a balanced all-rounder, the Wan'er with more air, vs a brighter step back from the original.

A closer listen.

11 topics · 5 divided
Left: criticalRight: positiveTighter lines: more agreementDashed: limited evidence

Tonality

Leans positiveDivided opinions
Reviewer sentiment20 supporting sources
CriticalNeutralPositive

Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average

Sources agree on the shape — a mildly V-shaped, vocal-forward Harman-style tuning — but split on whether it works. The larger camp hears a balanced all-rounder, essentially the original Wan'er with a touch more air. The other hears a brighter, edgier retune that lost some of the original's warmth, and several say plainly that the first Wan'er was the better-sounding earphone.

Measured

Twenty-five IEC-711-class rigs agree within about 1 dB below 6 kHz: a sub-bass shelf of roughly +7 dB that sits 1–2 dB under Harman IE 2019 below 60 Hz and 1–2 dB over it from 100 to 300 Hz, an ear-gain peak of +10 dB at 2.5 kHz, 2–4 dB under Harman from 3 to 5 kHz and 5–6 dB under at 6–7 kHz, an 8 kHz peak on target, and 3–5 dB over Harman from 12 to 16 kHz. Against the original Wan'er on ten shared rigs: within 0.6 dB below 100 Hz, +0.9 dB at 2 kHz, and +2 to +5 dB from 10 to 16 kHz.

Where it splits
A balanced all-rounder — the Wan'er sound with a little more air on top.63%

“Basically the same as OG Waner but with a little more treble air, helps boost resolution and imaging by a tiny tiny bit.”

Jay Audio (ranking sheet)
A brighter, edgier retune — the original Wan'er was the better tuning.37%

“from a warm, strong V-shape of the Wan’er SG to a bright V-shape”

Lumerion, Head-Fi
Link to this topic

The hardware

Specifications.

Checked

Design

Type
In-ear monitor
Drivers
1 × 10 mm dynamic (PET diaphragm)
Housing
plastic shell, UV-coated resin faceplate with metal plate

Electrical

Impedance
19 Ω
Frequency response
20 Hz – 20 kHz

Connection

Cable
Detachable, 1.2 m
Connector
0.78 mm 2-pin (not recessed)
Plugs supplied
3.5 mm, 4.4 mm balanced, USB-C (DAC in plug)

Manufacturer-published figures, not measurements · from linsoul.com, tangzu.net.

Follow the evidence

Sources 51

1–6 of 51 sources

Read with context

Limitations & method.

As of

What to keep in mind 5

  1. This is a read of where opinion sits in November 2026, about twenty months after launch; the sub-$25 field turns over quickly, and TANGZU's own Bass Version (the 'Red Lion') now sits beside it at a few dollars more.

  2. The Wan'er name covers several sets — the 2023 original, this second generation, the Red Lion, the Jade and Amethyst Dragon colourways and a retailer edition — and forum posters do not always say which they mean; posts were only counted when the model was clear.

Where to buy Product & retailer links

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.