In-Ear MonitorOverreview

Shure SE846 Gen 2

A decade-old flagship, one new filter, and a long argument about what that's worth.

47 sourcesUpdated
$999Typical US price

Score aggregates reviewer opinions across topics.

Check price on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Shure SE846 Gen 2

The short version

What to know.

A compact four-armature IEM whose fit and isolation are its most consistently praised qualities, with a sub-bass shelf that measures well above its SE535 sibling and steers clear of the lower mids. Reviewers and owners split on most of the rest. Launch-era press hears the new red filter as adding air and clarity; measurement and many hobbyists still find a steep drop above about 10 kHz, and some owners swap the red back out. Detail and soundstage split along similar lines, with press largely pleased and comparison-minded owners less so. Build reads as excellent in reviews, but owners report cracked shells and failed MMCX sockets after years, with repairs that amount to replacement. Value divides most sharply: at about $999 for unchanged drivers most hobbyist voices call it overpriced, a judgement that softens at sale or used prices.

About this product

The 2022 second generation (clear, jade or graphite): the same four-driver earphone as the 2013 SE846, plus a new red 'extended' filter fitted as standard.

When the SE846 arrived in 2013 it was among the pricier universal in-ears on sale: four balanced armatures, a folded acoustic low-pass channel that gave it unusual sub-bass for the type, and nozzle filters the owner could change. It became a fixture on stages and in the Head-Fi of its day.

The Gen 2 of 2022 keeps all of that and changes very little: new jade and graphite finishes, an added extra-small tip, and a fourth filter, red and labelled 'extended', that now ships fitted. Meanwhile the field moved, and much cheaper sets arrived with more air and detail. So the record below has two jobs: to say what this earphone does, and to report the argument over whether it still earns its roughly $1,000 asking price.

A good fit for

  • Stage and rehearsal monitoring, where isolation, secure fit and a clear low end matter most
  • Commuting, flights and gym use, if you want quiet and a fit that doesn't move
  • Listeners who want low-reaching bass that stays out of the mids, without much top-end energy
  • People who like to tune by hand and don't mind a fiddly swap to compare four filters
  • Anyone buying used or on sale, where the value complaints mostly fall away

Think twice if

  • You want air and sparkle above 10 kHz, which none of the filters reliably delivers
  • You're shopping for pure sound per dollar at full price; many cheaper sets beat it on detail
  • You own a Gen 1: the red filter is the only sonic change, and it splits owners
  • You have small ears and are coming from a smaller Shure model: try the larger shell first
  • Your source has high output impedance: at 9 Ω this set's bass and treble shift with it, so use a low-impedance output

The reviewer consensus

Agreement &
disagreement.

8 / 12topics divide opinion
1 Strong agreement3 Mostly agree8 Divided opinions

Common ground5

  • Passive isolation is unusually strong, above all on foam tips
  • The small shell and narrow nozzle fit most ears exceptionally well
  • The sub-bass shelf is the highlight, and it stays out of the lower mids

Points of contention7

  • Treble: whether the red filter fixes the top end, leaves the 10 kHz roll-off in place, or makes things rougher
  • Tonality: warm-neutral reference, or dark and dated
  • Mids: clean and forward, or congested behind the bass, depending on genre and comparison

A closer listen.

12 topics · 8 divided
Left: criticalRight: positiveTighter lines: more agreement

Isolation

PositiveStrong agreement
Reviewer sentiment11 supporting sources
CriticalNeutralPositive

Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average

The firmest agreement in the record, on foam tips above all. Reviewers, owners and critics alike call it unusually high for a passive IEM, and even the people who dislike the sound cite it as the reason to keep one.

“ピタッとはまればアクティブ・ノイズキャンセルがなくとも高い遮音性を実現できる。”

Yorokuya blog, owner review (Japanese: seated properly, it isolates well even without active noise cancelling)

“I certainly don’t hear my son’s YouTube video even though he’s sitting a metre away from me.”

Alfred Siew, Techgoondu

Measured

Shure specifies up to 37 dB. eCoustics reports nearly 24 dB with the Comply tips, so the maker's figure is a best case. On kakaku.com owners score isolation 4.65 against a category average of 3.79. Tips move it: owners rank Comply's longer P-series above the stock foam.

Link to this topic

The hardware

Specifications.

Checked

Design

Type
In-ear monitor
Drivers
4 × balanced armature (Three-way: 2 woofers, 1 midrange, 1 tweeter)4BA
Tuning
Nozzles · 4 options

Electrical

Impedance
9 Ω
Sensitivity
114 dB/mW≈ 134.5 dB/V
Frequency response
15 Hz – 20 kHz

Connection

Cable
Detachable
Connector
MMCX
Plugs supplied
3.5 mm

Physical

Released
2022-09

Manufacturer-published figures, not measurements · from shure.com (archived), shure.com (archived), thomann.co.uk.

Follow the evidence

Sources 47

1–6 of 47 sources

Read with context

Limitations & method.

As of

What to keep in mind 6

  1. A read of where reviews and owners land as of November 2026. This is a four-year-old revision of a 2013 design, and newer rivals keep shifting the comparison.

  2. Most of the measurements available are of the first generation's blue, white and black filters. Only one published curve shows the red filter, so what it does exactly is less firmly pinned down than the rest of the tuning.

Where to buy Product & retailer links

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.