Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Nobody disputes what the tuning is — a modern diffuse-field balance with a touch more upper treble than its peers — and almost nobody claims it is badly done. The split is over what that is worth. One camp hears a genuinely natural, unforced voicing that gets out of the music's way; the other hears a set that does nothing wrong and nothing memorable, and says so from both ends of the credibility spectrum. It is the widest disagreement in the set.
Measured
Relative to 1 kHz, three independent rigs put it up 4.5–7.7 dB at 20–30 Hz, roughly level by 200 Hz, up 7–8 dB at 3.0–3.25 kHz, and up 2–6 dB across 5–9 kHz. Against the Hisenior Mega5EST on the same rig that is about 1 dB less bass and about 3 dB more treble from 6–10 kHz — the whole of the difference the two camps are describing.
vs. listeners — The graphs settle what the set is and not what it is for. A curve this close to the target is exactly why one camp calls it correct and the other calls it predictable; both are looking at the same line.
“the Rockies excel by their subtlety: they have a natural timbre that rivals any single-dynamic driver”
Jürgen Kraus, Audioreviews
“A brighter take on the new meta sound signature, unfortunately a bit too bright. But very close to being great.”
Resolve, via IEM Ranking
