Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split, and this is the decision. Everyone hears the same thing — lean lower mids and an upper midrange pushed forward, so vocals sit close and bright. A slight majority by weight (measurers Bedrock, Super* and VSG, Headfonia, Prime Audio, Headphonesty, two Reddit reviewers) call it shouty, edgy or fatiguing, especially on female vocals and compressed pop. The other camp (Audio Discourse, Major HiFi, Durwood, bisonicr, Head-Fi's DiMenezes) hears clear, articulate, lively vocals and thinks the forwardness stops just short of harsh. Warm sources, tips and a little EQ come up again and again as the fix.
Measured
Ear gain is at or up to 1.9 dB above the Harman target at 3 kHz on every rig, peaking at 2.9–3.1 kHz on most and 4.1–4.8 kHz on three. What makes it read as forward is what surrounds it: sub-bass under target and a dip below 500 Hz. On the same rigs it runs 3.1–3.4 dB above the original Starfield at 3 kHz and 2.5–3.6 dB above the Aria 2.
vs. listeners — Against the Harman target the pinna gain is ordinary; against Moondrop's own previous budget sets it is about 3 dB hotter, with less bass to balance it. Listeners who came from the original Starfield or the Aria hear the shout; those who like Harman-bright sets often don't.
“In both configurations, there is too much ear gain and too much presence, so much so that even male vocals can sound sibilant.”
darmanastartes (Bedrock Reviews), Head-Fi
“The midrange is steady and predictable and that's not a bad thing.”
Audio Discourse (Antdroid)
