Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split. Sound On Sound, Stereoguide, Sound & Recording, PC Gamer and most owners hear a natural, well-balanced sound for the price, and Professional Audio found it fairly even at low volume. Bonedo heard it strongly treble-tilted with three resonances, HigherHz calls it harsh and "smiley", STEREO finds it a little cool, Musiker-Board hears emphasised upper mids, and a Reddit regular calls it a really bad speaker. All tested with the Tone knob fully left (the flat setting) unless they say otherwise.
Measured
Professional Audio (measured at DS-audioservice; rig and distance not stated): in the flat Tone setting the response varies by about ±5 dB above 100 Hz and largely matches Mackie's published curve. The full "Play" setting lifts the range below 200 Hz and above 1.5 kHz. No anechoic or Klippel measurement of this generation has been published.
vs. listeners — Mackie calls the fully-left Tone setting "flat"; the one measurement shows a ±5 dB response — even for the money, but not flat — so the balanced and bright camps are describing the same speaker with different expectations.
“Bei niedrigen Lautstärken erweist sich der Klang als recht homogen.”
Nicolay Ketterer, Professional Audio (German: “At low volume the sound is quite even”)
“Die CR3.5BT klingen sehr höhenbetont, was seit einigen Jahren dem Zeitgeist und der Vorliebe der Konsumenten zu entsprechen scheint.”
Patric Louis, Bonedo (German: “The CR3.5BT sound very treble-heavy, which seems to suit the times and consumer taste”)
