Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split almost evenly. One camp hears a controlled, relaxed, non-fatiguing top end — safe for the treble-sensitive, a little rolled-off or short on sparkle for treble-lovers. The other hears a bright-leaning, energetic, airy top that is detailed but can turn hot in the upper mids, sibilant or fatiguing — most often at higher volume, with the wide-bore 'Vocal' tips, or over long sessions. The split tracks something physical: the 4–7 kHz band moves about 3 dB with insertion depth, and a higher-impedance source or foam tips take several dB off the top octave.
Measured
Across 25 squig rigs the ear-gain peak sits at ~2.7 kHz (2.3–3.6 kHz), about 9 dB over the 500 Hz level and ~1.4 dB under Harman IE 2019 through 1.5–4 kHz; 4.5–7 kHz then dips ~4.4 dB under target (median), while 7.5–10.5 kHz sits ~1 dB over it and 11–16 kHz ~3 dB over (rigs disagree widely up there). Variant files show what moves it: a shallow fit lifts 4–7 kHz ~3.4 dB over a deep fit (A-Tech Reviews); a 15 Ω source cuts 10–16 kHz ~4.3 dB and 7–10 kHz ~2.8 dB versus a <1 Ω source (Audio Amigo); foam tips trim 10–16 kHz ~2.7 dB (boizoff).
vs. listeners — Both camps are describing the same curve: a dip at 4.5–7 kHz (where a deep fit makes it smooth and a shallow fit fills it in) beside an upper-treble lift above target. Listeners with a deep seal, a higher-impedance source or foam tips meet the relaxed version; a shallow seal, a low-impedance source, the wide-bore tips and higher volume bring out the bright one. Dracomies sums up the forum mood: some call it bright, others say it isn't.
“This is more of a controlled and relaxed treble, which is ideal for treble-sensitive people.”
Headfonics (Nihal)
“There are certain tracks that can become a little hot in the upper mids with the “Vocal” tips but this can be remedied quite well with the “Balanced” tips.”
Acho Reviews
