Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split. Most hear the best-judged tuning of Koss's cheap headphones — warm, full and natural, a middle ground between the bassier Porta Pro and the brighter KSC75. A minority find the same tuning muted or dull until it's EQ'd, and several measurers and owners argue it is simply the Porta Pro's sound, with any difference down to pads and clamp.
Measured
On oratory1990's GRAS rig it sits within about 1 dB of the Porta Pro from 100 Hz to 2 kHz, with 1.3 dB less at 20 Hz; all four rigs that hold both show 1.3–3 dB less deep bass than the Porta Pro, and three of four show 1–7 dB more somewhere in 3–6 kHz. Against the KSC75 it has 8–15 dB more at 20 Hz and 2–7 dB less at 3–4 kHz on every shared rig.
vs. listeners — The graphs back both the 'middle ground' camp and the sceptics: it measures as a Porta Pro with a little less deep bass and a little more treble, far closer to the Porta Pro than to the KSC75. A measurer who has swapped pads and headbands across the family puts it plainly: “All the drivers om their own are very similar” (SupOrSalad).
“The KPH40 is a solid middle ground between the others, being the bridge between their strengths”
Mad Lust Envy (Head-Fi review)
“I wasn't a huge fan of the KPH40 stock tuning, but it EQ's very nicely.”
Somefears (Head-Fi)
