Studio MonitorOverreview

JBL One Series 104-BT

Magazines call it the best little monitor for the money; the lab measurements beg to differ — and owners side with both.

36 sourcesUpdated
$199 / pairTypical US price per pair

Score aggregates reviewer opinions across topics.

Check price on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
JBL One Series 104-BT

The short version

What to know.

A compact powered desktop pair whose lab measurements are poor — Audio Science Review found heavy built-in EQ, a bass boost, an on-axis dip near 7 kHz and an irregular treble, and a second spinorama by Napier Lopez agrees on the shape while reading it more kindly at desk height. Sources agree on a strong stereo image and a stage that holds as you move, solid build, flexible inputs (TRS, RCA, aux and Bluetooth with an all-inputs mode) and good value at the $129–169 most reviewers paid. Opinion splits on the overall balance, the treble (crisp to some, bright and sibilant to many), how much bass and midrange it has, whether it plays loud enough, how fussy it is about desk height and angle, whether mixes made on it translate, and hiss at high volume. Owners also report an automatic standby and loud start-up chime, and some broken speaker-wire terminals.

About this product

The 104-BT (black) and 104-BTW (white) are JBL's 1 Series 104 desktop monitors with Bluetooth 5.0 and a front input selector added. JBL and reviewers describe the speakers themselves as the same as the original 104 from 2019, which JBL has since discontinued, so reviews and measurements of both are pooled here. Not JBL's larger 305P MkII or 306P MkII. A pair costs about $199 in the US as of October 2026.

JBL's 1 Series 104 arrived in 2019 as the company's smallest reference monitor: a pair of egg-shaped ABS cabinets, each with a coaxial 4.5-inch woofer and ¾-inch tweeter, with the 60 W amplifier, inputs, volume knob and headphone jack all in one host speaker that drives its partner over speaker wire. The 104-BT added Bluetooth and a front input selector that can play every source at once. A pair costs about $199 in the US.

It became a default budget desk-speaker recommendation, praised in magazine after magazine for its imaging, build and price. It is also one of the poorer-measuring speakers in Audio Science Review's database, and owners argue over its treble, its bass, its midrange on a desk and whether it is really a monitor at all.

A good fit for

  • Small desks where compact speakers and a strong centre image for voices matter — video editing, podcasts, games and casual listening
  • A secondary or travel reference for dialogue and mix checks, with the main decisions made elsewhere
  • Setups that need several sources at once — computer, phone over Bluetooth, an interface — without extra switching
  • Desks where the speakers can sit at or near ear height on stands or wedges

Think twice if

  • You need a primary monitor for final mix decisions — the measurements and several reviewers say look elsewhere
  • You are sensitive to sibilance or bright treble
  • You want deep bass without a subwoofer, or a subwoofer output to add one
  • You need to fill a room, or listen from more than a metre or two away
  • You want speakers that stay on through silence, or that start without a chime

The reviewer consensus

Agreement &
disagreement.

8 / 15topics divide opinion
1 Strong agreement6 Mostly agree8 Divided opinions

Common ground5

  • Imaging and stage are the standout: a locked phantom centre and a stage that holds as you move
  • Solidly built, compact cabinets with a metal grille — though the spring speaker-wire terminal is a weak point
  • Flexible inputs for the price — TRS, RCA, aux and Bluetooth, with an all-inputs mode and a front headphone jack

Points of contention8

  • Balance: broadly neutral for the size vs coloured and irregular in the lab
  • Treble: crisp and clean vs bright, coarse and sibilant
  • Bass: punchy and full for a 4.5-inch speaker vs light, with no real low end

A closer listen.

15 topics · 8 divided
Left: criticalRight: positiveTighter lines: more agreement

Tonality

Leans positiveDivided opinions
Reviewer sentiment20 supporting sources
CriticalNeutralPositive

Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average

Sources split. Most reviewers hear a broadly balanced or neutral sound for the size — Sound & Vision and DJcityTV call it accurate, PCMag relatively balanced, Estrada i Studio correct in its band balance — and Napier Lopez's measurement shows a listening window that tends towards flat. Audio Science Review's measurement and listening, a German forum measurement and two detailed Reddit reviews find it coloured: boosted bass, a hollow midrange and an irregular, bright top end. TechRadar likes the sound but says a low-mid boost rules it out as a reference.

Measured

Audio Science Review (Klippel NFS, plain 104): the passive drivers alone measure poorly; the host amplifier's built-in EQ lifts the bass and everything up to the ~1.7 kHz crossover, there is an on-axis cancellation around 7.4 kHz, and the predicted in-room response tilts bright. spinorama.org's preference score from that data is 2.0 out of 10 (4.8 with an ideal subwoofer); from Napier Lopez's own spinorama it is 2.4 (5.2 with a subwoofer). A hifi-forum.de member's measurement (puffreis) found the same pattern: a startling passive response partly calmed by the active EQ.

vs. listeners — The editorial camp mostly listened on a desk or slightly off-axis; Napier Lopez notes the 104 is voiced to sit below ear level, where its elevated treble mellows towards neutral. Audio Science Review's on-axis data and its listener heard the brighter, peakier version.

Where it splits
balanced enough for the size70%

“The JBL 104 has a listening window that tends towards flat, with a bit of a bass boost, as well as a slight treble boost when listened to head-on.”

Napier Lopez, The Next Web
coloured, not a reference30%

“Objective results are still nothing to write home about.”

amirm, Audio Science Review
Link to this topic

The hardware

Specifications.

Checked

Design

Type
Active bookshelf / standmountamplifiers built in
Enclosure
Ported, rear portcommunity-sourced: port position
Cabinet
ABS with metal grille, matte acrylic paint

Drivers

Drivers
1 × 4.5″ (118 mm) coaxial woofer + 1 × 0.75″ (19 mm) coaxial dome tweeter (soft dome)4.5″ (118 mm) coaxial woofer + 0.75″ (19 mm) coaxial tweeter

Acoustic

Frequency response
88 Hz – 20 kHz (−3 dB)60 Hz – 20 kHz (−10 dB)
Maximum output
104 dB SPL (peak, @ 1 m)

Amplification & connections

Amplification
30 W per speaker · 60 W system · Class D
Inputs
TRS, RCA, 3.5 mm
Bluetooth
Bluetooth 5.0
Subwoofer output
No
Speaker link
Cableprimary / secondary pair
Power
Mains (internal PSU)

Features

Auto standby
Yes

Physical

Weight
2,060 g per speaker
Dimensions
153 × 124 × 247 mm

The host speaker holds the 60 W amplifier (30 W per speaker) and drives the extension speaker (1.73 kg) over speaker wire. JBL rates maximum continuous output at 89 dB SPL. Its spec sheet gives 88 Hz–20 kHz at −3 dB and 60 Hz–20 kHz at −10 dB (measured in half-space); the product page lists 60 Hz–20 kHz as ±3 dB. Manufacturer-published figures, not measurements · from jblpro.com, jblpro.com, jblpro.com. Port position not published by the maker — community-sourced from hands-on reviews: musicradar.com, whathifi.com.

Follow the evidence

Sources 36

1–6 of 36 sources

Read with context

Limitations & method.

As of

What to keep in mind 4

  1. A read of where the reviews stand as of October 2026. Many reviews tested the original 104 without Bluetooth, which JBL and reviewers describe as the same speaker; their sound impressions are pooled here.

  2. Most of the glowing value verdicts were written when a pair cost $129–169; at today's $199 the comparison with rivals is tighter.

Where to buy Product & retailer links

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.