Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split. Most reviewers hear a broadly balanced or neutral sound for the size — Sound & Vision and DJcityTV call it accurate, PCMag relatively balanced, Estrada i Studio correct in its band balance — and Napier Lopez's measurement shows a listening window that tends towards flat. Audio Science Review's measurement and listening, a German forum measurement and two detailed Reddit reviews find it coloured: boosted bass, a hollow midrange and an irregular, bright top end. TechRadar likes the sound but says a low-mid boost rules it out as a reference.
Measured
Audio Science Review (Klippel NFS, plain 104): the passive drivers alone measure poorly; the host amplifier's built-in EQ lifts the bass and everything up to the ~1.7 kHz crossover, there is an on-axis cancellation around 7.4 kHz, and the predicted in-room response tilts bright. spinorama.org's preference score from that data is 2.0 out of 10 (4.8 with an ideal subwoofer); from Napier Lopez's own spinorama it is 2.4 (5.2 with a subwoofer). A hifi-forum.de member's measurement (puffreis) found the same pattern: a startling passive response partly calmed by the active EQ.
vs. listeners — The editorial camp mostly listened on a desk or slightly off-axis; Napier Lopez notes the 104 is voiced to sit below ear level, where its elevated treble mellows towards neutral. Audio Science Review's on-axis data and its listener heard the brighter, peakier version.
“The JBL 104 has a listening window that tends towards flat, with a bit of a bass boost, as well as a slight treble boost when listened to head-on.”
Napier Lopez, The Next Web
“Objective results are still nothing to write home about.”
amirm, Audio Science Review
