Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split, but lopsidedly. Roughly 85 % of the weighted sources — measurers, editors and owners alike — call it neutral, reference or simply 'natural', and owners describe running it without EQ. Against that stands a smaller camp led by Audio Science Review: short of bass and short through 1–3 kHz relative to a Harman-style target, and, for two former owners, plainly less satisfying than an HD 600 or an HE400se. The curve itself is barely in dispute; what the target should be is.
Measured
Every rig agrees on the shape. Against its own 200 Hz–1 kHz level the Susvara sits within about a decibel from 20 Hz to 1 kHz on every squig database that holds it (sai, Kuulokenurkka, a B&K 5128, VSG, IEM World, Passion for Sound). Against an HD 600 on the same rig it carries about 5–6 dB more at 20–40 Hz and 3.3–4.2 dB less at 1.2–2.2 kHz. Against Harman over-ear 2018 the GRAS-class rigs read it about 3.9 dB short at 1.2–2.2 kHz, and Crinacle's EQ to that target is a +5.7 dB bass shelf plus a +5.7 dB peak at 1,876 Hz. Crinacle still files it as 'Neutral' and S-tier.
vs. listeners — Nobody is misreading a graph; they are choosing different rulers. Against a bass-boosted target the Susvara is measurably short of bass and short through the presence band. Against its own midrange, a diffuse-field target or the listeners' ears, it is close to a straight line. On Audio Science Review's own member poll, 57 % rate it 'Poor' — most of them without having heard one.
“Overall, the Susvara boasts a balanced and airy sound, with a slight emphasis in the upper-treble region.”
unheardlab (sai)
“we lack bass which is typical of a number of other headphones. Response is also insufficient in the 1 to 3 kHz which likely is there to keep the headphone form sounding too bright”
Audio Science Review (amirm)
