Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split three ways. The heaviest camp — ASR, Erin, Hi-Fi Choice and a veteran speaker modder on the ASR thread — hears a broadly even balance with a slightly forward or bright upper midrange and treble, and several owners call it harsh or fatiguing: one on a Cambridge CX61, one on a Marantz amplifier, one on a Dayton DAX88 in a garage and a main room. A second camp (What Hi-Fi, CNET, audioFi, TNT) hears it as honest, open and uncoloured. A third, mostly owners, finds it neutral but boring, or thin and lifeless (one on a Yamaha RX-A1080 AV receiver).
Measured
ASR's Klippel scan calls the response 'rather flat', with a sharp woofer resonance at 700 Hz, a dip in energy around 1–2 kHz from a directivity mismatch at the ~2 kHz crossover, and a tweeter bump that Amir reads as deliberate 'zing'. Erin traces the 'glare' he heard to the 4–6 kHz region. spinorama.org scores the two datasets 4.75 (ASR) and 5.15 (Erin).
vs. listeners — Bright, recessed and thin can all come from the same curve: the 1–2 kHz dip pulls vocals and body back while the region above it stands out, so which one a listener notices depends on the music, the level and the room. Two of the harshest reports mention a garage and listening at high volume.
“the sound could be better as it was a bit bright and unexciting for lack of a better term.”
amirm, Audio Science Review
“The design sounds like a cross between the old Debut and the original Uni-Fi, with a clearer, more open performance than before.”
Ty Pendlebury, CNET (Sony STR-DN1080, floor stands)
“These speakers do what they're supposed to -- they add nothing -- yet they sound neutral and "boring."”
teched58, ASR review thread (owner, with a subwoofer)
