Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Mostly praised by ear, qualified by the lab. TechRadar, Mighty Gadget, techreviewer.de, Passion for Sound, Kyle Erickson and most owners call it balanced — "not flat", perhaps a touch warm or with a little upper-mid lift, but honest enough to edit on. Amir and Erin measured a response that is "not the most neutral" (roughly ±3 dB) with a treble dip and small midrange resonances, though Amir found it "warm and reasonably nice sounding" and both say it takes EQ well. A minority of owners hear it as boxy, muddy or thin.
“First impression defies the look of the measurements: the sound is warm and reasonably nice sounding.”
Amir, Audio Science Review
“I wouldn’t describe the overall sound as flat, but it is well-balanced.”
James Smythe, Mighty Gadget
“The highs sound awesome, and mids and lows sound good, but overall sounds boxy.”
Amazon owner review (3★)
Measured
Klippel NFS (ASR 2021, Erin 2022) plus Audio Lab Insight's Klippel data (2024): on-axis roughly within ±3 dB above the bass but with a scoop through the 2–4 kHz crossover region, resonances near 600 Hz and 1.2 kHz, and a predicted in-room response tilted toward the treble. spinorama.org preference score 3.25–3.4 across the three datasets (about 6.0 with an ideal sub) — against 1.5 or lower for the PreSonus Eris 3.5 2nd Gen.
vs. listeners — The listening camp is larger than the graphs might suggest. Amir said the sound "defies the look of the measurements", and Erin found the midrange resonance inaudible; the lab's complaint is mostly about a mixing monitor's standard, not a desk speaker's.
