In-Ear MonitorOverreview

DUNU Falcon Ultra

Two nozzles in the box, and reviewers who used different ones came away describing two different earphones.

13 sourcesUpdated
$219Typical US price

Score aggregates reviewer opinions across topics.

Check price on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
DUNU Falcon Ultra

The short version

What to know.

A single-dynamic-driver IEM at around $220, near-universally praised for build, cable and accessories, and for a low end whose control and texture almost nobody criticises. Sources agree the shells are comfortable and light for their metal construction, that the driver is easy to power but scales audibly with a cleaner source, and that the finish scratches and shows fingerprints. They divide on three things: how deep the bass really goes, whether the top end sparkles or bites, and whether the stage is ordinary or close to holographic. The first two splits track the nozzle fitted; the third tracks how much power the source is giving it.

About this product

The 2023 DUNU Falcon Ultra, a single 10.7 mm dynamic-driver IEM with a lithium-magnesium alloy dome and two screw-in tuning nozzles. It supersedes — and is not — the older, discontinued Falcon Pro, and it sits above the cheaper Titan S2 and Kima 2 in DUNU's single-DD line. Sold in two finishes that share the same driver and tuning: the original polished Klein Blue stainless steel at $239.99, and the later Meteorite Titanium edition at $219.

The DUNU Falcon Ultra is a roughly $220 in-ear monitor built around a single 10.7 mm dynamic driver — DUNU's second-generation ECLIPSE design, with a lithium-magnesium alloy dome and a ring-type magnet assembly borrowed down from the far pricier Zen. It arrives in polished stainless steel, with a modular cable that ships with both 3.5 mm and 4.4 mm plugs, a large case, and a spread of ear tips generous enough that reviewers spend as much time on the box as on the sound.

It also ships with two screw-in nozzles — one steel, one gold-plated brass — and that detail turns out to explain a surprising amount of the argument about it. Measured on two independent rigs, the two nozzles are identical below about 2 kHz and roughly 2–3 dB apart from 4 to 10 kHz. Reviewers who fitted the steel one and reviewers who fitted the gold one were, in a real sense, not reviewing the same treble.

A good fit for

  • Listeners who want one box with everything — modular cable, tips, case — and no further shopping
  • People who value bass quality and control over sheer sub-bass quantity
  • Small ears, and anyone who finds larger resin shells unstable
  • Anyone happy to swap nozzles to tune the top end to their own sensitivity

Think twice if

  • You want a big sub-bass shelf — the measured shelf is real but moderate
  • You are treble-sensitive and unwilling to fit the gold nozzle
  • Raw stage width is your priority; separation is the stronger suit here
  • You dislike MMCX, or want a finish that shrugs off pocket time

The reviewer consensus

Agreement &
disagreement.

4 / 12topics divide opinion
1 Strong agreement7 Mostly agree4 Divided opinions

Common ground5

  • Build, cable and accessory bundle are repeatedly called class-leading for the price
  • The low end is well controlled and textured — nobody accuses it of bloat or one-note bass
  • Small metal shells that wear light and suit small ears, despite ~10 g per side

Points of contention4

  • How deep the sub-bass reaches — impressive rumble to some, polite to most
  • Whether the treble sparkles cleanly or turns hot and tiring at volume
  • What the signature even is — warm and U-shaped, or neutral-to-V and not warm at all

A closer listen.

12 topics · 4 divided
Left: criticalRight: positiveTighter lines: more agreement

Bass

PositiveDivided opinions
Reviewer sentiment8 supporting sources
CriticalNeutralPositive

Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average

Sources split on depth, not quality: everyone calls the low end controlled and well textured, but roughly two-thirds describe the sub-bass as polite rather than deep.

Measured

Both rigs put the bass shelf near +8 dB at 20–40 Hz relative to 500 Hz, with mid-bass (100–200 Hz) around +4.7 dB — a sub-bass-led shelf of moderate depth. The nozzles change it by only about 0.3–0.4 dB.

vs. listeners — Several reviewers describe the low end as mid-bass-focused, yet on both rigs sub-bass sits roughly 3 dB above mid-bass. The shelf is real but modest by current bass-forward standards, and it is set against an unusually strong 2–4 kHz lift — so the bass reads quieter next to the vocals than its absolute level suggests.

Where it splits
sub-bass digs deeper than expected31%

“Sub-bass is deeper than expected with very good rumbles.”

Suman Sourav Meher, The Headphone List
excellent quality, but modest sub-bass reach69%

“Sub-bass doesn’t kick very deep and has a moderately fast decay”

James, Headfonics
Link to this topic

The hardware

Specifications.

Checked

Design

Type
In-ear monitor
Drivers
1 × 10.7 mm dynamic (2nd-gen ECLIPSE driver, lithium-magnesium alloy dome)
Tuning
Nozzles · 2 options
Housing
CNC-milled stainless steel housing

Electrical

Impedance
16 Ω
Sensitivity
108 dB/mW≈ 126 dB/V
Frequency response
5 Hz – 40 kHz

Connection

Cable
Detachable
Connector
MMCX
Plugs supplied
3.5 mm, 4.4 mm balancedmodular

Physical

Weight
10 g per earpiece

Manufacturer-published figures, not measurements · from dunu-topsound.com.

Follow the evidence

Sources 13

1–6 of 13 sources

Read with context

Limitations & method.

As of

What to keep in mind 6

  1. A read of where the reviews land as of August 2026 — the sub-$300 single-driver field moves fast, and several rivals here have been replaced since.

  2. Most of the published reviews date from the 2023–24 launch window, when the set was new and priced higher than it often sells for now.

Where to buy Product & retailer links

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.