HeadphoneOverreview

Beats Solo 4

The best-selling on-ear lost its famous bass and gained a 50-hour battery — and reviewers can't agree whether what's left sounds balanced, bright or dull, or whether anyone can wear it for long.

26 sourcesUpdated
$200Typical US price

Score aggregates reviewer opinions across topics.

Check price on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Beats Solo 4

The short version

What to know.

A light (217 g), folding, closed-back on-ear headphone without noise cancelling, whose sound, comfort and durability all divide opinion. Most sources agree that it is a clear break from the bass-heavy Beats of old, that its battery lasts far beyond most wireless headphones (labs measure about 52 to 84 hours against Beats' 50-hour rating), that it can be used over Bluetooth, USB-C or a passive 3.5 mm cable, and that it lacks noise cancelling, transparency, wear detection and an adjustable EQ. They disagree on nearly everything else. The largest group hears a balanced, close-to-neutral tuning; others hear it bright and thin, dull and muddy, or mildly sculpted. Measurements put the bass within about a decibel of neutral and the upper midrange and treble a few decibels above it. The firm clamp keeps it stable during exercise, but about two-thirds of the weighted sources report pressure on the ears or the top of the head within one to two hours. Passive isolation is weak in the bass, where engine noise sits, and better against voices and higher sounds. Owners also report one earcup cutting out after a few months. At its $199.99 list price most reviewers call it poor value; it often sells for $100–$150.

About this product

Beats' fourth-generation Solo on-ear, launched in May 2024 as the successor to the 2016 Solo3 Wireless. Not the noise-cancelling Solo Pro (2019), the Solo Buds earbuds or the over-ear Studio Pro; the colourways and retailer-exclusive finishes sold as Solo 4 are the same headphone.

The Beats Solo 4 arrived in May 2024, nearly eight years after the Solo3 Wireless, as the latest version of one of the most widely worn headphones of the last fifteen years. It keeps the familiar folding on-ear shape and $199.99 price, but replaces almost everything inside: new 40 mm drivers and acoustics, USB-C charging and digital audio, a 3.5 mm input that works with the battery dead, Personalized Spatial Audio with head tracking on Apple devices, and Beats' own chip with one-touch pairing and Find My on both iPhone and Android. It has no active noise cancelling, no transparency mode, no wear detection and no adjustable EQ.

Its reputation is a split one. Nearly every reviewer agrees the bass-heavy Beats sound is gone and that the battery lasts for days, but they disagree on what replaced the bass — balanced, bright and thin, or dull and muddy — and on whether the firm on-ear clamp is a secure fit or a source of sore ears within the hour. Owners add a further worry: one earcup cutting out after a few months. It now often sells well below list, which changes the value question.

A good fit for

  • People who specifically want a compact on-ear rather than an over-ear or earbuds, mostly for short sessions
  • Listeners who want a cleaner, less bass-heavy Beats with very long battery life
  • Households that mix iPhone and Android, since pairing and Find My work on both
  • Walking, light gym use and offices, where the firm clamp keeps it stable and the pads damp voices
  • Buyers who can get it on sale for around $100–$150

Think twice if

  • You want to wear headphones for hours at a time, have a larger head, or wear glasses or several earrings
  • You commute by plane, train or bus — there's no noise cancelling and little bass isolation
  • You want the big, bass-forward Beats sound, or are sensitive to forward treble
  • You want an adjustable EQ, auto-pause or seamless switching between a phone and a laptop
  • You'd rather not risk the one-side failure owners report — the pads aren't replaceable either

The reviewer consensus

Agreement &
disagreement.

9 / 11topics divide opinion
2 Mostly agree9 Divided opinions

Common ground6

  • A clear break from the bass-heavy Beats of old — even reviewers who like the bass call it restrained, and Solo3 owners notice the difference.
  • Exceptional battery life — rated at 50 hours, measured at 52.5 (Les Numériques), 72+ (01net), 73 (TechGearLab) and 84 hours (SoundGuys).
  • Three ways to listen: Bluetooth 5.3 (AAC and SBC only), USB-C digital audio including lossless, and a 3.5 mm cable that works with the battery dead.

Points of contention9

  • Tonality: 'balanced' vs 'bright and thin' vs 'dull and muddy' vs 'mildly sculpted' — measurements put the bass near neutral and the treble lifted.
  • Bass: 'lean' vs 'punchy and controlled' — close to flat on a neutral target, light next to bass-boosted rivals.
  • Mids: 'clear and forward' vs 'scooped or muddy'.

A closer listen.

11 topics · 9 divided
Left: criticalRight: positiveTighter lines: more agreement

Tonality

No overall leanDivided opinions
Reviewer sentiment18 supporting sources
CriticalNeutralPositive

Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average

Sources split four ways over what replaced the old Beats boom. The largest group hears a balanced, close-to-neutral tuning — the most neutral Beats yet. Others hear it bright and thin, with the top end pushed forward and the low end short of weight; a smaller group hears it dull, muddy or congested; and a few hear a mildly sculpted V with lifted bass and treble. Almost no one hears the classic bass-heavy Beats sound.

Measured

RTINGS labels the bass 'Slightly Underemphasized (-1 dB)', the treble 'Slightly Emphasized (1 dB)' and the signature 'Bright', and rates its frequency-response consistency as amazing once the cups are seated. Its B&K 5128 curve, normalised at 500 Hz, stays within about 1 dB of RTINGS' target from 20 to 300 Hz, sits about 3 dB above it at 1 kHz and 3 kHz and 4–5.5 dB above it at 4–5 kHz, and stays 2–4 dB above it from 6 to 12 kHz. On the same rig it has about 4–5 dB less deep bass than the over-ear Studio Pro and 5–7 dB less upper bass (100–200 Hz) than Sony's WH-1000XM5. SoundGuys and TechGearLab both measure less bass and more treble than their own preference targets (SoundGuys' MDAQS overall score: 3.9 of 5); Fnac's lab scores the frequency response 7.5 of 10.

vs. listeners — The measurements support the balanced and bright camps — bass close to neutral, upper mids and treble lifted — and neither the dull nor the bass-led verdicts. Which camp a reviewer lands in tracks the reference: against a neutral target it measures nearly flat in the bass, while against bass-boosted consumer headphones and older Beats it sounds lean and bright. As an on-ear headphone it also depends on how well the pads seal; RTINGS and SoundGuys both note the result changes with how the cups are seated.

Where it splits
Balanced and close to neutral — the least bass-driven Beats yet.41%

“They're a lot more neutral-sounding, which fans of Beats' previous bassy offerings may find a tad disappointing, but it's a win for those looking for something more balanced.”

RTINGS
Bright and thin — the treble pushed forward, the bass short of weight.27%

“Sans afficher de réelle distorsion, le haut du spectre paraît en majorité un peu trop en avant à l'oreille.”

Les Numériques (Guillaume Fourcadier) — the top of the spectrum sounds a little too far forward
Dull, muddy or congested — the sound loses definition when the mix gets busy.16%

“The lower mids are also disappointingly muddy, but the upper mids are pleasantly crisp without being harsh.”

TechRadar (Lewis Maddison)
Mildly sculpted — lifted bass and treble around slightly scooped mids, but not overdone.16%

“Although the sculpting here is obvious between the boosted lows, accentuated highs, and somewhat scooped mids, it's not as exaggerated as on some competing models.”

PCMag (Tim Gideon)
Link to this topic

The hardware

Specifications.

Checked

Design

Type
Closed-back on-ear
Drivers
1 × 40 mm dynamic
Microphone
Built-in

Connection

Cable
Detachable
Connector
3.5 mm
Plugs supplied
3.5 mm
Bluetooth
Bluetooth 5.3
Noise cancelling
No
Battery
50 h
USB audio
Yes
Wired input
Yes

Physical

Weight
217 g
Released
2024-05

Manufacturer-published figures, not measurements · from apple.com, beatsbydre.com, bhphotovideo.com.

Follow the evidence

Sources 26

1–6 of 26 sources

Read with context

Limitations & method.

As of

What to keep in mind 6

  1. This is a read of where opinion lands as of November 2026, for a headphone that launched in May 2024 — prices and the rivals it's compared with have moved since.

  2. Most professional reviews judged it at its $199.99 list price; it often sells for $100–$150, which makes the value question much kinder.

Where to buy Product & retailer links

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.