Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split. SonicScoop and Sound On Sound hear a smoother, cleaner and more neutral cube than the original Auratone 5C, still honky by design, and a Gearspace owner calls it more hi-fi than an Auratone. ASR measured a badly uneven response with clear resonances, Amazona's 2016 comparison heard boxy, slightly dull voices and overstated upper mids, and ASR members and Reddit users who know the original 5C say it changes the midrange in the wrong way.
Measured
ASR (Klippel NFS, driver axis): no flat region at all, with resonances after the driver's natural response from about 5 kHz; spinorama.org computes a preference score of −3.58 (1.16 with an ideal subwoofer). Owners' in-room sweeps (Skol303 on Gearspace, a treated room) show the expected mid hump with room effects such as a desk-reflection dip at 600–700 Hz.
vs. listeners — Both camps agree the cube is mid-centred; they differ on the upper midrange. The measured resonances sit in the 2–7 kHz region where owners also report a scratchy or harsh edge, so the "smoother than an Auratone" camp is comparing it with a speaker that is rougher still rather than with a neutral monitor.
“Oh boy. I have not see such a bad response from any other speaker.”
Amir Majidimehr, Audio Science Review (Klippel NFS)
“The Avantone MixCubes arguably sounded more “neutral” and broadband than either the originals or the re-issues from Auratone.”
Justin Colletti, SonicScoop (compared side by side with original and reissued Auratones)
