Studio MonitorOverreview

Avantone Active MixCubes

The studio's most argued-over little box: a mix-saver to engineers, a measurement disaster to the lab.

26 sourcesUpdated
$499 / pairTypical US price per pair

Score aggregates reviewer opinions across topics.

Check price on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Avantone Active MixCubes

The short version

What to know.

A single-driver, sealed mix-check cube. ASR's Klippel measurements show almost no output below about 190 Hz (−6 dB), a bumpy, resonant response with breakup above roughly 2 kHz, and narrowing dispersion — a preference score of −3.58. Sources agree that it strips a mix down to the midrange, that it is unforgiving of distortion, masking, vocal level and compression problems, that it is not a pleasant listen, that it is beautifully built, and that each cube's external power supply is comically large. They split on whether it sounds cleaner and more neutral than an Auratone or peaky and resonant, on whether its harsh upper range helps or misleads, on whether you can judge kick and bass on it, and on whether mixes balanced on it really translate better than they would with an EQ'd main monitor or a cheap speaker.

About this product

Avantone Pro's powered take on the Auratone 5C "grot box", sold as the Active MixCube (now "Mixcube Active") since 2009 and redesigned by early 2012 with a 60 W amplifier, an external gain knob and a shallower cabinet. Black, cream, red and white are the same speaker. Not the passive MixCubes, which need an external amp. A pair costs about $499 in the US as of October 2026; a single cube, often bought for mono checks, is $259.

The Active MixCube is Avantone Pro's powered version of the cube-shaped mix-check speaker that Auratone's 5C made a studio fixture: one 5.25-inch paper-cone driver in a sealed, 6.5-inch MDF box, with no tweeter, no crossover and no port, driven by a 60 W amplifier with a big heatsink on the back and a separate power supply. It is not meant to be anyone's main monitor. Engineers sit one or two on the console bridge to balance vocals, snare and bass against the midrange that survives on phones, laptops and car stereos. A pair costs about $499; many people buy a single cube for mono checks.

Its reputation splits along an unusually clean line. Sound On Sound, Tape Op, Amazona and SonicScoop treat it as one of the most useful tools a mix room can own, and owners echo them. Audio Science Review measured it in 2023 and found one of the worst frequency responses it had ever recorded, with resonances and driver breakup across the upper midrange — and a long argument followed about whether that matters for a speaker built to sound bad on purpose.

A good fit for

  • Engineers who want a second, midrange-only reference beside full-range monitors, for vocal levels and balance
  • Checking a mix in mono on a single cube
  • Small or untreated rooms where the main monitors' bass can't be trusted
  • Anyone moving between studios who wants the same small reference everywhere

Think twice if

  • You need your only pair of monitors — it has no bass or top end to judge
  • You want a faithful copy of the original Auratone's sound; owners of originals hear a cleaner but different cube
  • You'd rather measure-and-EQ your main monitors than learn a deliberately coloured speaker
  • Desk space and power outlets are tight — each cube adds a large external power supply

The reviewer consensus

Agreement &
disagreement.

5 / 13topics divide opinion
1 Strong agreement7 Mostly agree5 Divided opinions

Common ground5

  • A midrange-only tool: essentially nothing below about 150–200 Hz and little above 10 kHz, by design
  • Exposes mid-range problems — vocal level, masking, distortion, mouth clicks, compression — that full-range monitors hide
  • Not a pleasant listen and not a main monitor; it works next to full-range speakers

Points of contention5

  • Tonality: cleaner and more neutral than an Auratone vs peaky and resonant, far from neutral
  • Bass: a clean roll-off that helps judge kick and bass vs too little low end to judge anything
  • Upper range: smoother than the original 5C vs harsh and breaking up above 2 kHz

A closer listen.

13 topics · 5 divided
Left: criticalRight: positiveTighter lines: more agreement

Tonality

Leans criticalDivided opinions
Reviewer sentiment10 supporting sources
CriticalNeutralPositive

Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average

Sources split. SonicScoop and Sound On Sound hear a smoother, cleaner and more neutral cube than the original Auratone 5C, still honky by design, and a Gearspace owner calls it more hi-fi than an Auratone. ASR measured a badly uneven response with clear resonances, Amazona's 2016 comparison heard boxy, slightly dull voices and overstated upper mids, and ASR members and Reddit users who know the original 5C say it changes the midrange in the wrong way.

Measured

ASR (Klippel NFS, driver axis): no flat region at all, with resonances after the driver's natural response from about 5 kHz; spinorama.org computes a preference score of −3.58 (1.16 with an ideal subwoofer). Owners' in-room sweeps (Skol303 on Gearspace, a treated room) show the expected mid hump with room effects such as a desk-reflection dip at 600–700 Hz.

vs. listeners — Both camps agree the cube is mid-centred; they differ on the upper midrange. The measured resonances sit in the 2–7 kHz region where owners also report a scratchy or harsh edge, so the "smoother than an Auratone" camp is comparing it with a speaker that is rougher still rather than with a neutral monitor.

Where it splits
peaky and resonant, far from neutral55%

“Oh boy. I have not see such a bad response from any other speaker.”

Amir Majidimehr, Audio Science Review (Klippel NFS)
cleaner and more neutral than an Auratone45%

“The Avantone MixCubes arguably sounded more “neutral” and broadband than either the originals or the re-issues from Auratone.”

Justin Colletti, SonicScoop (compared side by side with original and reissued Auratones)
Link to this topic

The hardware

Specifications.

Checked

Design

Type
Active bookshelf / standmountamplifiers built in
Ways
1-way
Enclosure
Sealed
Cabinet
18 mm MDF, Dacron stuffing

Drivers

Drivers
1 × 5.25″ cone full range (paper cone, cast aluminum frame, shielded)5.25″ full-range

Acoustic

Maximum output
104 dB SPL (@ 1 m)

Amplification & connections

Amplification
60 W per speaker · Class A/B
Inputs
XLR, TRS
Power
External power supply

Physical

Mounting
5/8"-27 mic-stand mount in the base, 7 mm neoprene pad
Weight
3,234 g per speaker
Dimensions
165 × 165 × 165 mm
Released
2009-10

Avantone's product page gives the frequency response as 200 Hz–10 kHz; its manual and Thomann give 90 Hz–17 kHz as the "useful musical range". Each cube has its own external power supply. Manufacturer-published figures, not measurements · from avantonepro.com, avantone.imgix.net, thomannmusic.com.

Follow the evidence

Sources 26

1–6 of 26 sources

Read with context

Limitations & method.

As of

What to keep in mind 5

  1. A read of where reviewers and owners stand as of October 2026. The MixCube has been on sale since 2009 and was redesigned by early 2012, so the oldest reviews and owner ratings partly describe the earlier version.

  2. This is a specialist tool, and opinions about it are really opinions about a way of mixing: people who never learned to work on a small mid-range speaker rarely rate it, and people who did rarely give it up.

Where to buy Product & retailer links

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.