Audiowords

7Hz x Crinacle Zero:2

The $25 sequel that swapped the original Zero's sparkle for slam — a near-consensus budget champ whose one real argument is whether the smoother treble is a comfort win or a step too dark.

The ~$25 Zero:2 (a.k.a. 7Hz Salnotes Zero 2) is a single 10 mm dual-cavity dynamic-driver IEM in a translucent acrylic shell with an aluminium faceplate — the 2023 sequel to the 2022 7Hz Salnotes Zero, again voiced with reviewer Crinacle, now with roughly +3 dB more low-end and a smoother, less-peaky treble via a new PU+Metal composite driver and cable. 32 Ω, 108 dB/V, 10 Hz-20 kHz, 0.78 mm 2-pin, ~4 g/side, in Silver/clear, Orange and Blue. Not the original 7Hz Salnotes Zero (the 'Zero 1'), and not the Truthear-made x Crinacle Zero / Zero:RED / Zero:BLUE(2), which are separate dual-DD collaborations.

OverreviewIn-Ear Monitor14 sourcesas of 2026-07-02

The 7Hz x Crinacle Zero:2 is the 2023 follow-up to the 7Hz Salnotes Zero, the roughly $20 single-dynamic IEM that became the default 'first real IEM' recommendation on the strength of a near-reference tuning. For the sequel, 7Hz and reviewer Crinacle kept the shape and the price but added a new 10 mm driver, an upgraded cable, translucent shells — and, most audibly, about 3 dB more bass with a smoother top end.

That makes the Zero:2 less a revolution than a re-flavouring of a proven recipe, and it landed as one of the most-recommended ultra-budget sets on the market — #1 in IEMs by Reddit sentiment and a 4.2/5 across thousands of owner ratings. It also split the enthusiast crowd in a very specific way: almost everyone agrees it's excellent value and easy to live with, while the measurement-minded argue about the treble and the die-hards argue about whether it's actually an upgrade over the original at all.

The overview

The 7Hz x Crinacle Zero:2 is a ~$25 single-dynamic-driver IEM and the Crinacle-tuned sequel to the 7Hz Salnotes Zero, re-voiced warmer and bassier with a smoother treble. Reviewers broadly agree on the core: a warm-neutral, lightly V-/W-shaped tuning with clearly enhanced sub- and mid-bass, clean and natural mids, a smooth non-fatiguing top, cohesive imaging, an average-but-good-for-price soundstage (more depth than width), a feather-light comfortable shell, and objectively excellent engineering — measurements show unusually low distortion and an easy-to-drive load. It is also, near-universally, treated as outstanding value and a safe budget default. The genuine disagreement is the treble: everyone hears/measures the same smoother, less-airy top (a real dip through 4-8 kHz versus the original), but one camp calls that a fatigue-free comfort win while a measurement-backed camp calls it too recessed/dark and prefers a little EQ. Secondary fault lines: whether the extra bass is 'perfectly judged' or 'polarizing' (some hear a touch of mid-bass bloat, a lone reviewer finds it bass-light, and the slam is fit-dependent); whether the Zero:2 is even an upgrade over the cleaner, airier original Zero; and the recurring gripes about a cheap cable, no case, and some reports of a channel failing. Resolution is agreed to be only 'average' — the tuning-first limiter — and the toy-ish looks are a matter of taste.

Where they agree

  • A warm-neutral, bass-boosted re-tune of the original Zero — variously called mild V/W, U-shaped or 'Harman with more bass,' but fun-leaning and consumer-friendly.
  • Clearly enhanced sub- and mid-bass with real rumble and punch from the new 10 mm driver — the headline upgrade and the highlight for most.
  • A smooth, non-fatiguing top end that removes the original's harsh upper-treble peak (at the cost of some air).
  • Clean, natural, un-recessed mids and cohesive imaging; an average-but-good-for-price stage with more depth than width.
  • Exceptional engineering for the money — measurements show very low distortion and an easy-to-drive, source-agnostic load.
  • Feather-light, comfortable shells and, above all, outstanding value: a safe budget default and a common 'first real IEM' recommendation.

Where they split

  • Treble: 'smooth and non-fatiguing, the OG's peak fixed' vs 'too recessed/dark, ~5 dB short and better EQ'd' — the split tracks how measurement-minded the listener is.
  • Is it even an upgrade over the original Zero? Several reviewers prefer the OG's cleaner, airier, more open balance and treat the Zero:2 as a different flavour, not a better one.
  • Bass: 'perfectly judged and satisfying' vs 'polarizing' — a few hear mild mid-bass bloat, a basshead finds it too tame, and one reviewer even calls it bass-light; perceived quantity is strongly fit-dependent.
  • Cable and durability: 'the new cable is softer/better' vs 'cheap and thin, no case, and some report a channel dying.'
  • Comfort by fit: featherlight and all-day for most, but the shallow, short-nozzle fit won't seal for everyone.
The verdict, mappedEvery aspect on one axis — criticized to praised. Hover a point for its spread; click to jump.
CriticizedNeutralPraised

By aspect — in detail

Treble

Contested · 13 src

The one genuinely contested axis. The measured facts are agreed: versus the original Zero the Zero:2 tames the old upper-treble peak and drops presence through roughly 4-8 kHz, so it's smoother, safer and less airy. Where reviewers split is on the verdict. One camp — most editorial reviewers and comfort-first listeners — calls it non-fatiguing and ear-friendly, a clear improvement on the OG's occasional harshness. A measurement-backed camp calls it too recessed/dark, short on sparkle, and best restored with a touch of EQ. A lone outlier (Headphonesty) still finds it can get shouty on busy tracks.

Measured

Both a GRAS 45CA (ASR) and a B&K 5128 (Resolve) read the same tilt: the original Zero's upper-treble peak is removed and there's a real dip through the 4-8 kHz region — amirm quantifies it as a '5+ dB' treble shortfall; Acho Reviews' squig.link work calls the 5-6 kHz dip 'a little too pronounced.' Upper-treble air rolls off, so sparkle is reduced. amirm's AB tests preferred a treble-lifting EQ.

⚠ vs. listeners — Same measured smoothing, opposite verdicts: what one camp hears as 'safe and non-fatiguing' the other measures as a 5 dB shortfall and hears as 'recessed/dark.' The two heaviest measurement sources land on the critical side — amirm preferred EQ, and Resolve's ranking-list note is bluntly 'Treble is still a problem' — while most subjective reviewers count the calmer top as an upgrade.

Where it splits
Smooth, laid-back and non-fatiguing — the OG Zero's harsh peak is gone; a comfort win that keeps enough clarity.55%

This results in a more laid-back treble, stepping back from the limelight while still unravelling sufficient details.

Prime Audio
Too recessed/dark and short on air — a real ~5 dB treble shortfall that measurement-minded listeners prefer to EQ back.45%

the highs were a little recessed and at times I was hearing bass I didn't even know was there!

Audio Science Review (amirm)

Bass

Moderate · 13 src

The headline change and the near-universal highlight: about +3 dB over the original gives real sub-bass rumble and a punchy, articulate mid-bass from the new 10 mm driver — powerful and fun without going full basshead. It's mostly praised as controlled, but the picture isn't unanimous: a few measurement-leaning reviewers hear a touch of mid-bass bloat, a basshead finds it doesn't hit hard enough, and one reviewer (Headphonesty) even calls it bass-light. RedditRecs flags the bass as 'polarizing,' and much of that tracks fit — a deep seal is needed to lock in the slam.

With the 7Hz Zero 2, the bass takes centre stage, embodying a newfound depth and resonance.

Prime Audio

the sub-bass is the star and the mid-bass feels a bit bloated.

Hi End Portable
Measured

The spec sheet adds ~3 dB in the low frequencies versus the original Zero; Resolve's 5128 graph shows 'noticeably more presence in the midbass area' where the OG ramped mainly into the sub-bass. Extension reaches down to ~20 Hz with a seal, and amirm's distortion measurements are exceptionally low even at high SPL, so the bass stays clean. Perceived quantity is strongly seal-/fit-dependent.

Tonality

Moderate · 13 src

Broad agreement on the recipe even as labels vary: a warm-neutral balance with boosted bass and a tamed treble — variously called warm-neutral, a mild V/W, U-shaped, or 'another Harman/DF with more bass.' The through-line is a deliberate, more consumer-friendly, fun-leaning move away from the original Zero's leaner, more reference tuning, and amirm confirms it still holds close to a sensible target. Whether that warm tilt suits you is the taste question behind the treble and 'is-it-an-upgrade' debates.

A warm-neutral, bassy take on the Zero: a thick, satisfying low-end with tidy mids and a smooth, non-shouty top that trades sparkle for comfort.

iemranking (review aggregate)

7Hz Zero 2 has a warmer, more fun sound signature compared to the original Zero.

Prime Audio
Measured

amirm reads it as 'excellent compliance with our target,' with a lift between ~100-300 Hz and a shortfall from ~4-8 kHz — i.e. warmer and smoother than neutral rather than a strict reference line. Specs: 10 mm dual-cavity DD (PU+Metal diaphragm), 32 Ω, 108 dB/V (93.1 dB/mW), 10 Hz-20 kHz.

Mids

Moderate · 12 src

Consistently rated a strength for the price: clean, natural and un-recessed, with a touch more body and warmth than the original thanks to the extra bass. Reviewers call the midrange linear and free of shout or sibilant peaks; vocals stay clear even if they're not the forward focus. The modest dissent is that the added warmth can thicken the presentation, and a couple of reviewers hear male vocals as slightly lean or short on texture and expression.

The Zero: 2 have a very linear midrange.

Headphonesty

Vocals stay clean and fairly natural (not buried), but the extra bass can make the presentation feel a bit thicker than the OG Zero.

iemranking (review aggregate)

Soundstage

Moderate · 9 src

A pleasant surprise for the money rather than an absolute strength. Reviewers converge on a stage that's average in size but well beyond expectations at $25 — not congested, with more depth than width and a mostly frontal presentation. A minority (and OG-Zero fans) hear the original as more open, tying the Zero:2's slightly closer stage to its heavier bass.

the Zero 2 punches well above its weight class. The improved driver design and tuning seem to create a surprisingly spacious soundstage.

Gears For Ears

Stage is average with a presentation that can feel more depth than width

iemranking (review aggregate)

Imaging

Moderate · 8 src

A quiet, consistent strength: cohesive, tidy separation and solid positioning that reviewers and owners single out as good for the price — a set that sounds 'together' rather than pinpoint-analytical. It's also cited as a budget gaming pick for positional audio, with little real disagreement here.

the Zero: 2 achieve very decent imaging.

Headphonesty

Also amazing is the level of instrument separation/spatial qualities. So, so satisfying.

Audio Science Review (amirm)

Detail

Moderate · 11 src

The agreed technical limiter. Most reviewers land on 'average resolution' — honest, tonal detail rather than a treble trick, and generally a hair less resolving than the original because of the softer top. Several note it slightly trails the OG here; a couple (Hi End Portable, and amirm once EQ'd) think it resolves better than its price and graph suggest. Either way, detail retrieval is the thing the tuning-first Zero:2 gives up first.

Not as resolving or detailed as the original

Prime Audio

rather more resolving than the price, profile and frequency response might lead one to believe.

Hi End Portable
Measured

Micro-detail is capped by the rolled-off upper treble more than by any lower-frequency smearing; amirm found perceived detail ('the highs are to die for') improved noticeably with a treble-lifting EQ, which supports the read that resolution is limited by tuning, not driver competence.

Dynamics

Moderate · 6 src

Rated punchy and lively, driven by the enhanced low end — a set that slams and feels fun rather than flat or over-controlled. It won't feel ultra-fast on busy tracks against pricier sets, and the dynamism is bass-led, but for the class it's an engaging, energetic performer.

the Zero 2 goes into party mode as the bass thumps and rumbles.

Prime Audio

punchy and dynamic in the bass

iemranking (review aggregate)

Comfort

Moderate · 11 src

A near-universal high point with one asterisk. The feather-light (~4 g) shells disappear in the ear and are widely called all-day comfortable. The asterisk is fit depth: the nozzles are fairly short and insertion is shallow, so a minority (including Resolve) can't get a locked-in seal, and RedditRecs lists both 'comfortable for long sessions' and 'uncomfortable fit for some ears.' Tip rolling and a deeper seal resolve it for most.

the design is quite comfortable and you will be able to wear the IEM all day long without any discomfort.

Gears For Ears

It doesn't work for me personally, but that's in large part due to the more shallow fit.

Resolve, Headphones.com

Build

Moderate · 11 src

Adequate for $25, with recurring caveats. The translucent plastic shells look toy-ish but are sturdier than they appear, and the new colourways are an improvement. Opinions on the cable split — a couple of reviewers find the SPC cable softer/better than the OG's, but the dominant verdict is that it's cheap and thin, there's no case, and there are scattered reports of a channel failing. Accessories are basic (generous on tips, nothing else).

Frankly, only airline freebie earbuds have dinkier cables.

Headphonesty

the right earbud of the Zero:2 actually started to die on me after a few months even with careful use.

StreamTech Reviews

Isolation

Moderate · 6 src

Average to good, and seal-dependent. It's a vented sealed design, so with a solid (ideally deep) fit and the right tips it isolates well enough for commuting and everyday use — some owners rate isolation as a standout — while a shallower fit gives only average passive attenuation.

Passive noise isolation is average, making the Zero 2 suitable for most everyday environments.

Prime Audio

Isolation is typically average to good if you get a solid seal

iemranking (review aggregate)

Value

Strong consensus · 13 src

The broadest agreement of all: at ~$25 (often ~$20 street) the Zero:2 is treated as outstanding value and a safe blind-buy budget default — 'some of the best value in all of audio' in Resolve's words, #1 in IEMs by Reddit sentiment, and 4.2/5 across thousands of owner ratings. The honest counter is that it's an incremental sidegrade to the original rather than a leap, the accessories are basic, resolution is only average, and expert scores actually scatter widely (3.6 to 8.3 out of 10) — so 'great value' is nearly unanimous, but 'great set' depends on which camp you're in.

But if they work for you this could be some of the best value in all of audio.

Resolve, Headphones.com

excellent value tuning with big, enjoyable bass and safe treble; it's mainly held back by average resolution and basic accessories

iemranking (review aggregate)
Measured

$24.99 MSRP, frequently ~$20-22 street. Aggregates: 6.1/10 IEMR-normalized across 8 expert reviews (reviewer average 5.7, per-reviewer scores from 3.6 to 8.3) on iemranking; 77% positive across 502 aggregated Reddit reviews and #1 in IEMs on RedditRecs; 4.2/5 from 3,262 Amazon ratings and 4.2/5 from 22 Head-Fi ratings.

Best for

  • First-time IEM buyers wanting a safe, well-tuned, easy-to-drive set for ~$25
  • Listeners who want a warm, fun, bass-forward signature that stays smooth and non-fatiguing
  • People who found the original Zero too lean or too bright in the treble
  • Casual listening, commuting and budget gaming (cohesive imaging, good isolation with a seal)
  • Anyone happy to EQ — measurements show it responds superbly to a small treble lift

Skip if

  • You chase air, sparkle and treble extension out of the box — the top is deliberately rolled back
  • You want maximum resolution and micro-detail; this is a tuning-first set with only average technicalities
  • You already own the original Zero (or a similar budget set) and want a real step up, not a re-flavour — look higher (e.g. Simgot EW200)
  • You need premium accessories or a rugged cable and case in the box
  • Your ears need a deep insertion to seal — the short nozzles fit shallow

At a glance

Type
IEM
Sources
14 · 6 classes
As of
2026-07-02
Owner rating
4.2/5 · 3262self-selected — skews high
Sources14 reviews across 6 classes. Weight reflects expertise × independence; echoes collapsed.
  1. s17Hz x Crinacle Zero 2 ReviewPrime AudioEditorial2023-12-05w0.65
  2. s27Hz x Crinacle Zero: 2 Review — Gateway DrugHeadphonestyEditorial2023-12w0.70
  3. s37Hz x Crinacle Zero 2 Review — Music for the MassesHi End PortableEditorial2024-01w0.65
  4. s47HZ x Crinacle Zero: 2 ReviewPerrivan AudioEditorial2023-12w0.60
  5. s57Hz x Crinacle Zero 2 ReviewGears For EarsEditorialaffiliate2024-03-25w0.50
  6. s6Salnotes 7Hz Zero vs Crinacle Zero:2StreamTech Reviews (BadIntent)Editorialaffiliate2024-09-17w0.45
  7. s77hz Salnotes Crinacle Zero 2 — Official Thread (B&K 5128 measurements)Resolve, Headphones.comMeasurement2023-11-27w0.90
  8. s87Hz x Crinacle Zero:2 IEM Review (GRAS 45CA measurements, listening, EQ)Audio Science Review (amirm)Measurement2023w0.90
  9. s97Hz x Crinacle Zero: 2 review (Acho Reviews / achoreviews.squig.link)Acho Reviews (SenyorC), via Headphones.comEditorial2024-01-07w0.70
  10. s107hz Zero 2 x Crinacle — 6.1/10 normalized across 8 expert reviewsiemranking.comCommunityaffiliate2026w0.70
  11. s117Hz x Crinacle Zero:2 — All Reddit Reviews (77% positive, 502 reviews, #1 in IEMs)redditrecs.comCommunityaffiliate2026-07-01w0.60
  12. s127hz Crinacle Zero 2 vs the Rest (Review) — B-/'more bass slapped on top'JayyAudio (Jays Audio), RedditVideo2023-12w0.50
  13. s13I regret buying the 7hz Zero 2 (prefers the clearer Moondrop Chu 2)ChampionFrosty7222, RedditCritical2024w0.40
  14. s14Linsoul 7Hz x Crinacle Zero:2 — product listing & owner ratings (4.2/5, 3,262 ratings)Amazon (Linsoul Store)Owneraffiliatew0.35

Limitations & method

Consensus-of-sources synthesis · as of 2026-07-02 · not a measurement verdict or ground truth.