Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split. Every measurement shows the same thing — treble well above the Harman target with a narrow peak around 8 kHz, more top-end energy than the Simgot EW200 and far more than the Zero:2. Most press reviewers hear that as sparkle and air that stays just on the right side of harsh; a large group of owners, Jaytiss and HiFiASMR hear it as piercing, sibilant and fatiguing; a smaller middle group likes the clarity but notes sibilance on some tracks. Several reviewers explicitly warn treble-sensitive listeners off.
Measured
Seven independent squig rigs (mostly IEC 711-class couplers), normalised at 500 Hz: within ~1–2 dB of the Harman IE 2019 target through 1–4 kHz, then ~1–5 dB over it at 6–10 kHz and ~4–7 dB over at 10–16 kHz, with a narrow peak centred anywhere from ~7.6 to ~9.8 kHz depending on the rig. On shared rigs that is ~2.5–4.5 dB more 6–10 kHz energy than the Simgot EW200 and ~4–5 dB more than the 7Hz Zero:2. ATechReviews' deep-fit seating trims 4–10 kHz by under 1 dB; one of boizoff's foam-tip files cuts 10–16 kHz by ~3 dB.
vs. listeners — The peak appears on every rig, but its centre moves with the rig — the signature of a coupler resonance. Bad Guy Good Audio argues the 8 kHz height is largely a measuring artifact, while HiFiASMR reads the same graph as the set's main flaw. The owner complaints of piercing, sibilant vocals suggest it is audible to a sizeable minority either way.
“Very good level of resolution and descriptive ability, despite the high energy level.”
Hi End Portable
“these sound very good, the treble is very piercing”
Amazon owner review (verified purchase)
“The vocals and instruments are at the verge of becoming peaky and sibilant, but they don’t seem to lose the integrity of the notes.”
SherryLion (Head-Fi)
