Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split. Everyone hears an energetic top end, and the rigs confirm it: an extra peak near 8 kHz and more 5–7 kHz than the Zero:2. Most reviewers — the bulk of the Head-Fi showcase, Paul Wasabii, dazztrazak, SPL Reviews, SuperChonk and both Japanese blogs — call it lively but smooth: no sibilance, no harshness, fine for long sessions, even "safe". A smaller camp hears grain and brightness that can fatigue or sting on electronic hi-hats. That camp is weighted toward experts and includes two reviewers who measure it themselves (Crinacle and Jaytiss), plus bluranerd, the one showcase reviewer who bought his own pair. The split tracks treble sensitivity and listening level more than anything about individual units.
Measured
Across 10 squig rigs (normalised at 500 Hz, against the Harman IE 2019 target), 8 put a peak at 7.8–8 kHz about 3–5 dB above target, after a 2–6 kHz region sitting 0.5–3 dB below it; two rigs (DucBloke, Soundcheck39) put the peak near 5 kHz with a 10–12 kHz lift instead. Compared with the 7Hz Zero:2 on the same eight rigs, which cancels each rig's own resonances, the Ultra carries 2.5–4 dB more energy at 5–7 kHz. Above 10 kHz the rigs disagree by several dB, though most show extra upper air. Audio Amigo's 15 Ω and 30 Ω source files leave the treble unchanged.
vs. listeners — The graphs show more treble energy than the "smooth and safe" camp describes. Crinacle, Jaytiss and Paul Wasabii, who all measure, call it energetic (Paul likes it; the other two call it the set's weak point). The smooth camp is real but rests on how that energy lands: tips, insertion depth and volume move the 5–8 kHz band, and coldfish, who otherwise heard no fatigue, reports grain once the Ultra is pushed hard on a revealing desktop DAC.
“This doesn't really get in your face.”
Paul Wasabii (video review)
“but it does have a grainy sense to its treble, which makes it a little bit rough.”
Jaytiss (video review)
