HeadphoneOverreview

Sony WH-1000XM3

Name: Sony WH-1000XM3
Brand: Sony

The noise-canceller that ended Bose's run at the top — near-universally loved for its quiet and its fit, and still argued over for a bass-heavy, upper-mid-shy sound that most owners end up fixing in the app.

39 sourcesUpdated 2026-10-04

$180Typical US price

Score aggregates reviewer opinions across topics.

Check price on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

The short version

What to know.

A closed, wireless noise-cancelling over-ear that most sources still rank among the best ANC headphones of its era. They agree it cancels low-frequency drone superbly with no audible hiss, that it is light and comfortable for hours (the pleather pads do get warm and sweaty), that the 24–30 h battery and USB-C quick charge are excellent, and that the touch controls are fiddly — and can phantom-trigger in cold weather — with no multipoint pairing. Many reviewers put Bose's QC35 II level or slightly ahead on noise cancelling, and the call microphone splits early reviews (clear) from later testers and owners (muffled). The sound is where opinion divides. The measurements agree on the facts: six rigs put the bass roughly 5–7 dB above an HD 600 at 100 Hz, and five of them a 5–9 dB dip around 2–5 kHz; oratory1990's model predicts a 33/100 preference score before EQ. Mainstream reviewers mostly hear that as warm, rich and natural; measurement-minded reviewers and enthusiasts hear thick, one-note bass and a muffled, recessed top end. The near-universal fix is the Sony app's EQ (a few dB less bass, more upper mids) — which drops LDAC to a lesser codec — and the three operating modes (ANC on, powered ANC off, passive) sound noticeably different. Build splits owners down the middle: plenty of units are still going after five to eight years, while others report cracked headband clips, creaking hinges and Sony declining warranty repairs.

About this product

The 2018 flagship wireless noise-cancelling over-ear (~255 g, $348 / £330 at launch): 40 mm drivers, Sony's QN1 noise-cancelling processor, USB-C charging, LDAC / aptX / aptX HD / AAC / SBC over Bluetooth 4.2, touch controls on the right cup, Quick Attention, a 5-band app EQ and up to 30 h of battery with ANC on. It folds into a hard case and also plays wired over its 3.5 mm cable, powered (with ANC and DSP) or passively. Not the WH-1000XM2 it replaced, nor the WH-1000XM4 that succeeded it (multipoint, Speak-to-Chat) or the later WH-1000XM5/XM6. Sony has stopped selling it; most pairs now change hands used or refurbished.

Sony's WH-1000XM3 arrived in 2018 as the third WH-1000X and the one that changed the conversation about travel headphones. It pulled level with — and for many reviewers past — Bose's QuietComfort 35 II on noise cancelling, shed weight, moved to USB-C and a dedicated QN1 chip, and became the default answer to 'which wireless headphones should I buy?' for the next two years.

Three successors later it survives mostly on the used market, which keeps the debate alive. Almost everyone agrees on the quiet, the comfort and the battery; the arguments are about the sound — a thick, warm, bass-forward voicing that some hear as rich and natural and others as muddy until it's equalised — and about whether its light, all-plastic build is travel-proof or fragile.

A good fit for

Commuters, flyers and open-office workers who mainly want strong noise cancelling, all-day comfort and long battery life — at a used price
Listeners who like a warm, bass-rich sound, or who are happy to spend a minute in the app EQ
Anyone who wears headphones for hours and values light weight over a premium build
Bargain hunters: at roughly $180 used, the ANC-and-comfort package is hard to match

Think twice if

You want a neutral, detailed sound out of the box and won't EQ — the stock tuning is thick in the bass and shy in the upper mids
You take a lot of calls — the microphone is a common complaint
You need multipoint pairing, or you live somewhere cold and rely on touch controls
You want a durable, premium build — the all-plastic frame has a real record of creaks and cracked headband clips
You want the newest ANC and features — the XM4 and later models moved on

The reviewer consensus

Agreement &
disagreement.

5 / 12topics divide opinion

7 Mostly agree5 Divided opinions

Common ground6

Noise cancelling is among the best of its generation — it all but erases low-frequency drone with no audible hiss; the open question is only whether Bose's QC35 II matched or edged it.
Light (~255 g) and comfortable for hours, folding into a good hard case — though the pleather pads get warm and sweaty, and wear out over the years.
Long battery life (24–30 h measured with ANC on) and USB-C quick charging.
The stock sound is bass-heavy, and the Sony app's EQ is the standard fix — but turning the EQ on drops LDAC to a lesser codec.
The touch controls are fiddly, and several sources report phantom touches in cold weather; there's no multipoint pairing.
Its three modes sound different: ANC on, powered with ANC off (more bass, clearer mids) and unpowered passive (much darker).

Points of contention6

Tonality: 'warm, rich and natural' vs 'colored, dark and in need of EQ' — the same measured curve, heard against different references.
Bass: 'deep and punchy' vs 'thick, one-note and muddying' — the larger, measurement-backed camp wants a few dB less.
Mids: 'well-balanced' vs 'recessed upper mids' — the split follows the measurement rig as much as the listener.
Treble: 'crisp and sparkly' vs 'muted, veiled or unrefined' — mostly about the presence dip, not the top octave.
Build: 'light but long-lived' vs 'plasticky, creaky and prone to cracked headband clips' — owners report both, years apart.
Calls: early reviews (PCMag, CNET, The Verge) found the microphone clear; Tom's Guide, RTINGS, Headphonesty and many owners call it muffled.

A closer listen.

12 topics · 5 divided

Left: criticalRight: positiveTighter lines: more agreement

Choose a topic

Isolation

PositiveMostly agree

Reviewer sentiment26 supporting sources

CriticalNeutralPositive

Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average

The headline strength. Every source that tested it rates the noise cancelling highly — low-frequency drone (planes, buses, HVAC, engines) all but disappears, with no audible hiss, and RTINGS's isolation score sat at the top of its table for years. The spread is comparative: The Verge, CNET, MKBHD and Audiophile On put it ahead of Bose's QC35 II, while PCMag, Tom's Guide, The Master Switch and SoundGuys (after Bose's update) give Bose the edge, especially on wind. Voices and sudden noises get through, and pressure changes or bumpy rides can make it momentarily distort.

“Their ANC feature does a superb job of blocking out ambient noise, especially if you have a bit of music playing in the background.”
RTINGS

“We have to talk about Sony’s noise canceling. It’s unreal.”
The Verge (Vlad Savov)

“The noise cancelling works extremely well and does not hiss audible like some of the cheaper ones do.”
DIY-Audio-Heaven (Solderdude)

“for pure silence, you need to be looking at the Bose QuietComfort35 IIs”
The Master Switch (Rob Boffard)

Measured

RTINGS readers point to its 9.8 noise-isolation score, long the top of its table; a staff reply in the comments agrees it held that spot for years but notes it was tested on an older methodology. Owners agree in bulk: Amazon's noise-cancellation topic runs 1,747 positive to 219 negative. The recurring limits are voices (RedditRecs lists 'Noise cancellation ineffective against human voices and extreme loud noises' as a top con) and pressure: Headphonesty and Head-Fi's Asspirin describe distortion or crackle when train doors close, in tunnels or on bumpy bus rides.

Link to this topic

Tonality

Leans positiveDivided opinions

Reviewer sentiment26 supporting sources

CriticalNeutralPositive

Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average

Sources split: the larger camp — most mainstream editorial, the video reviewers and, by their topic counts, most Amazon owners — hears a warm, rich, natural sound that is fun and easy to live with; the other camp — the measurement labs and enthusiast forums — hears a thick, dark, colored tuning that needs EQ before it sounds balanced. The graphs don't contradict either: they show the same warm, bass-heavy, presence-shy curve, and the split tracks what the listener compares it with. Almost everyone ends up at the same advice: trim the bass and lift the upper mids in the Sony app.

Measured

Six rigs with raw data agree on the shape (ANC on, Bluetooth, vs an HD 600/650 on the same rig): +4.7 to +7.2 dB at 100 Hz (oratory1990, Super* Review, Kuulokenurkka, Aden, unheardlab, RTINGS) and a 2–5 kHz dip of roughly 5–9 dB on every one except RTINGS's. oratory1990's EQ sheet predicts a 33/100 preference rating before EQ (100 after) and prescribes −8 dB below 190 Hz and +6 dB above 1.4 kHz; Sonarworks measures a high-mid dip of “almost 10db”. The mode matters: with ANC off (powered) the bass rises further but the midrange flattens — DIY-Audio-Heaven: “Bass is way too elevated but from 200Hz to 18kHz the tonal balance is quite ‘correct’” — and unpowered passive use is far darker (−10 to −13 dB at 1.5–3 kHz on Aden's and unheardlab's rigs).

vs. listeners — There is no real conflict over the curve — the warm camp and the colored camp describe the same measured tilt. Sonarworks puts the reconciliation plainly: “They are not neutral sounding out of the box, but the coloration they add is not unpleasant.” Whether that reads as ‘rich’ or ‘muddy’ depends on the listener's reference and on whether they reach for the EQ.

Where it splits

Warm, rich and natural — a pleasant, engaging consumer voicing that sounds good out of the box.56%

“adding weight and richness in a pleasant, natural and, dare we say it, analogue way.”
What Hi-Fi?

Colored, dark and too bassy — muddy on good recordings, and it really wants the app EQ to sound balanced.44%

“The sound is too warm and bassy when playing well made recordings which sound ‘muddy’ and ‘fat’ and lack definition in the lows.”
DIY-Audio-Heaven (Solderdude)

Link to this topic

The hardware

Specifications.

Checked 2026-10-04

Design

Type: Closed-back over-ear
Drivers: 1 × 40 mm dynamic (dome type (CCAW Voice coil), Aluminum coated LCP diaphragm)

Electrical

Impedance: 47 Ω
Sensitivity: 104.5 dB/mW≈ 117.8 dB/V
Frequency response: 4 Hz – 40 kHz

Connection

Cable: Detachable, single-entry, 1.2 m
Plugs supplied: 3.5 mm
Bluetooth: Bluetooth 4.2SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC
Noise cancelling: Yes
Battery: 30 h
Wired input: Yes

Physical

Weight: 255 g

Impedance and sensitivity are with the unit powered on; powered off they fall to 16 Ω and 101 dB/mW. Manufacturer-published figures, not measurements · from sony.co.uk.

Follow the evidence

Sources 39

Read with context

Limitations & method.

As of 2026-10-04

What to keep in mind 6

This is a read of where opinion lands as of October 2026 for a 2018 headphone that Sony has since replaced three times — most pairs now sell used, so condition, pads and battery health matter as much as the reviews.
How it sounds depends a lot on setup: the noise-cancelling, ANC-off and unpowered modes are voiced differently, the app EQ changes it substantially, and a poor seal (glasses, hair) shifts the bass.
Test rigs disagree about how deep the upper-midrange dip is, and people's ears differ too — if clarity in vocals and guitars matters to you, try a pair or plan to EQ.
Build reports are genuinely mixed: some pairs last the better part of a decade, others crack at the headband within a year or two. Check the hinges and headband clips on a used pair.
Owner star ratings skew positive because they come from people who chose to buy it — and even Amazon's own owner comments are much more mixed on durability and comfort than the headline score.
Many verdicts are relative to Bose's QuietComfort 35 II or to Sony's later models, so the comparison you care about may shift the conclusion.

Where to buy Product & retailer links

Sony WH-1000XM3 Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Sony WH-1000XM3

How the score adds up

What to know.

A good fit for

Think twice if

Agreement &
disagreement.

Common ground6

Points of contention6

A closer listen.

Isolation

Measured

Comfort

Measured

Tonality

Measured

Bass

Measured

Mids

Measured

Treble

Measured

Detail

Soundstage

Imaging

Dynamics

Build

Measured

Value

Measured

Specifications.

Design

Electrical

Connection

Physical

Sources 39

Limitations & method.

What to keep in mind 6