Audiowords

Meze Audio 109 Pro

A gorgeous, warm-and-airy open-back nearly everyone loves the look and build of — argued over for a lively treble that's sparkle to some and sibilance to others, and whether $799 buys the sound or mostly the design.

The 2022 Meze 109 Pro — an over-ear open-back dynamic (50 mm custom driver, 40 Ω, ~112 dB/mW, ~375 g) with black walnut earcups and a zinc-alloy/manganese-steel self-adjusting frame; MSRP $799/€799. Meze's first open-back dynamic, distinct from the closed 99 Classics/99 Neo and from the far pricier planar Empyrean/Elite/Liric.

OverreviewHeadphone9 sourcesas of 2026-07-09

The Meze 109 Pro is the Romanian maker's first open-back dynamic headphone, launched in 2022 at $799 beneath its far pricier planar Empyrean and Elite. It pairs a custom 50 mm dual-composite driver with black walnut earcups, a zinc-alloy and manganese-steel frame and a self-adjusting headband, and its easy 40 Ω / ~112 dB load runs off almost anything — a headphone as known for its industrial design as for its sound.

It arrived to a wave of praise as a fun, warm, beautifully made sub-$1k open-back, and it's still widely recommended. But it's a genuinely controversial one: reviewers and owners agree on the looks, build and comfort, then split over an elevated treble that some hear as airy sparkle and others as fatiguing sharpness, over whether the price buys the sound or mostly the craftsmanship, and over how technical it really is for the money. Plenty to average — and real disagreements to map.

The overview

Meze's 109 Pro is a 50 mm open-back dynamic that's easy to drive (40 Ω, ~112 dB) and famous as much for its walnut-and-metal industrial design as its sound. Sources broadly agree on the pillars: a gorgeous, premium, repairable build that's near the top of its class; a light (375 g), soft-padded, self-adjusting fit most find very comfortable; a rich, textured, punchy mid-bass with more low end than a typical open-back (sub-bass is the relative weak point); a fun, engaging, warm-leaning W-shaped tuning that is explicitly not neutral/reference; strong dynamics, clarity and detail for the price; and an open, out-of-head stage that's wide for a dynamic. It's easy to drive on paper but rewards a powerful, warmer source with noticeably better bass texture, and being open-back it doesn't isolate. The disagreements are the decision-relevant part. The headline split is the treble: a lifted 7 kHz-and-up region that most reviewers (and many owners) hear as sparkly, airy and non-fatiguing, but that treble-sensitive listeners hear as sharp or sibilant — conditional on source, cable and pad break-in, and enough that a minority return them. Value splits the same way: a complete-package bargain at $799 to some, overpriced-for-the-sound to others who say you're paying for the design and that cheaper rivals (HiFiMan Edition XS, the HD 6XX, even the ~$70 Truthear Hexa) resolve as well or better. Comfort is excellent for most but the caliper/clamp pressure gives some ear soreness after an hour or two; the warm tilt is cozy to most and slightly haze-inducing to a few; soundstage width draws 'speaker-like' from some and merely 'modest' from others; the mids carry a mild 1–2 kHz dip that a few find hollow.

Where they agree

  • Gorgeous, premium, repairable build — walnut cups and a metal frame widely called one of the best at the price.
  • Very comfortable for most: light (375 g), soft velour pads and a self-adjusting headband (with a clamp caveat for some).
  • Rich, textured, punchy mid-bass — more low end than a typical open-back, with reach toward 20 Hz.
  • A fun, engaging, warm-leaning W-shaped tuning — explicitly not neutral or reference.
  • Strong dynamics, clarity and detail for the price.
  • An open, out-of-head soundstage that's wide for a dynamic.
  • Easy to drive on paper (40 Ω, ~112 dB) but noticeably better bass texture off a powerful, warmer source.
  • Open-back: no isolation, leaks both ways.

Where they split

  • Treble: the elevated top end reads as airy sparkle and non-fatiguing to most, but as sharp or sibilant to treble-sensitive listeners — conditional on source, cable and pad break-in, and enough that a minority return them.
  • Value: a complete-package bargain at $799 to some; overpriced-for-the-sound to others, who say you're paying for the design and that cheaper rivals (Edition XS, HD 6XX, even the ~$70 Truthear Hexa) match or beat it.
  • Comfort: extremely comfortable for most, but the caliper/clamp pressure causes ear soreness for some after an hour or two (fit-dependent).
  • Warmth: cozy and musical to most; to a minority the warm tilt slightly clouds clarity.
  • Soundstage width: open and almost speaker-like to some, merely modest for an open-back to others.
The verdict, mappedEvery aspect on one axis — criticized to praised. Hover a point for its spread; click to jump.
CriticizedNeutralPraised

By aspect — in detail

Treble

Contested · 9 src

The defining disagreement. Everyone describes the same elevated top end — a lifted upper treble (roughly 7 kHz and again post-12 kHz) that adds air and sparkle — but listeners split on what it means. Most reviewers and many owners find it energetic yet non-fatiguing; treble-sensitive listeners hear sharpness or sibilance, conditional on source, cable and pad break-in, and a minority return the headphone over it.

Measured

The elevated treble is agreed on the graph: Pragmatic Audio measures a slightly emphasised, extended treble against the Harman OE 2018 target; Twister6 hears a boosted upper-treble (12–17 kHz) over a linear lower-treble; ASR members flag a 7 kHz peak. It measures bright, and SoundGuys calls it 'a touch trebly.' ASR's Peterinvan found it 'a bit hot' out of the box and says it settled with burn-in; ASR members even swap in AKG K240 front-foam discs to smooth the 3–6 kHz region.

⚠ vs. listeners — The elevated top end is real and agreed. Whether it lands as pleasant air/sparkle or as fatiguing sharpness tracks the listener's treble sensitivity plus the source, cable and pad wear-in — not a measured difference between units.

Where it splits
Bright and sparkly, but non-fatiguing — the lifted top end adds air and detail without turning harsh.62%

the 109 PRO feels sparkled and plentiful on the top side, but thankfully never painful or wince-worthy.

Headfonics
Too hot for treble-sensitive ears — sibilant on some sources/cables, and enough that a minority send them back.38%

it can be sibilant depending on the source and if you’re using Mese’s stock cable.

r/headphones (Otherwise-Rope8961)

Value

Contested · 8 src

Genuinely split at $799. One camp calls it a complete package — the build, looks, comfort and fun sound together justify the price. The other says you're mostly paying for the design and craftsmanship: the sound-per-dollar is beaten by cheaper rivals (HiFiMan Edition XS, the HD 6XX, even the ~$70 Truthear Hexa) and pricier planars out-resolve it, so it isn't the 'value' headphone the hype suggests.

Measured

$799/€799, current. Much of the value is the industrial design, walnut/metal build and repairability (SoundGuys notes replaceable parts 'help justify the price tag' but still scores value 6/10). Sound-per-dollar dissenters name the Edition XS, HD 6XX and Truthear Hexa; ASR's srkbear calls it 'style over substance,' while r/headphones' CapitalCount 'would personally not categorize them as the value headphones' he was led to expect.

Where it splits
A complete package at $799 — the build, comfort, looks and fun sound earn the price.55%

the 109 Pro is a complete package for $800.

Pragmatic Audio
Overpriced for the sound — you're paying for the design, and cheaper rivals do as much or more.45%

€ 800.- is not really cheap though and there are lots of alternatives at that price, the Ed XS would be a cheaper and not that different sounding alternative.

Audio Science Review (solderdude)

Tonality

Moderate · 7 src

Warm-leaning and fun rather than neutral — a rich mid-bass paired with an airy treble lift, described as a warm/W-shaped 'house sound.' Most find it musical and engaging and explicitly not a reference tuning; a minority who prefer neutrality feel the warmth slightly clouds clarity. Measurement-minded reviewers call it the most balanced Meze while stressing it isn't 'neutral.'

Meze 109 Pro has an exciting, fun tuned, bright leaning W-shaped signature that makes for a very engaging listen

Twister6

there’s a little bit of haze in what could otherwise be clear sky

r/headphones (CapitalCount)
Measured

A warm-of-neutral W-shape: elevated mid-bass and upper treble with a slight 1–2.8 kHz dip. Pragmatic calls it 'probably the most neutral and balanced headphone in their collection'; SoundGuys warns it's 'not especially neutral' and steers audio engineers elsewhere.

Bass

Moderate · 8 src

A consistent strength: rich, textured, well-controlled mid-bass with more low end than a typical open-back, and reach down toward 20 Hz. The one agreed caveat is that the sub-bass is the relative weak point — present but not the deepest, and several wish for a touch more rumble. The bass texture also scales noticeably with a more powerful, warmer amp.

this feels like one of the smoothest dynamic driver bass experiences I’ve heard in years.

Headfonics

The only issue I hear is that I wish the headphone reproduced some more sub-bass.

Ear Fidelity
Measured

Pragmatic measures a rich, textured mid-bass that doesn't dig as deep as planar rivals, with low distortion (~2% in the sub-bass, THD <0.1% at 1 kHz even past 100 dB). Twister6 hears reach to ~20 Hz with more mid-bass punch than sub-bass rumble; Headfonics finds the low end scales markedly with amp power (thin on a phone, 'slick and creamy' on ~3.5 W).

Mids

Moderate · 6 src

Mostly warm, full-bodied and natural, with forward, engaging vocals from a lifted 3–4 kHz ear-gain region. The recurring caveat is a measured dip around 1–2 kHz that a few hear as a slight hollowness or 'something missing,' most noticeable on modern recordings.

warm and full-bodied, providing excellent instrument tonality and a natural sound

Ear Fidelity

The Meze 109 PRO mids around 1-2k are a bit lackluster and feel like something is missing.

Headfonics
Measured

Twister6 measures a 1–2.8 kHz dip with strong (~9 dB) ear gain peaking at 3–4 kHz; ASR's Ilkless notes '2 kHz is a bit too subdued.' The forward upper-mids make vocals present; the lower dip is what a minority read as hollow.

Soundstage

Moderate · 7 src

Generally a plus — open, out-of-head and wide for a dynamic, with good depth and layering. But width verdicts split: some hear a spacious, almost speaker-like stage, while others call it merely modest for an open-back and not as expansive as the biggest planars.

It’s almost like listening to stereo speakers.

Ear Fidelity

soundstage is honestly not very big to my ears

r/headphones (CapitalCount)
Measured

Twister6 and Pragmatic hear an open, out-of-head stage wider than most dynamics; Headfonics and Apos call the width modest with strong depth; an owner notes it's 'wide but not expansive like my HEKV2 or the HD 800 S.' A perceptual spread, not a unit difference.

Imaging

Moderate · 6 src

Good, if not class-leading. Placement and separation are praised and the presentation is coherent, but the upper-treble lift and 1–2 kHz dip make images read a little thin to some, and pricier planars are noted as more precise.

fairly good imaging, which is slightly thinner than I like

Twister6

instrument separation and imaging is okay but not as detailed as HEKV2 and 800S.

r/headphones (Otherwise-Rope8961)
Measured

Localization and separation rate well across sources; Twister6 ties the slight thinness to the scooped 1–2.8 kHz and boosted upper treble. Precise but not the last word at the price.

Detail

Moderate · 5 src

A strength for the price — clear, resolving and rich in micro-detail, helped along by the airy treble lift. The nuance: a few feel the warmth slightly softens the sense of clarity, and it isn't the most technical option in its bracket.

What it does exceptionally well for its asking price is clarity, micro-detail retrieval, left to right separation and layering.

Twister6

They overall do feel clear and resolving, but to me, their clarity and resolution are somewhat impaired by this warmth.

r/headphones (CapitalCount)
Measured

The lifted upper treble boosts perceived detail and clarity; resolution is genuinely strong for $799, though some owners rate pricier planars (HiFiMan Arya) and even the Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro as more resolving.

Dynamics

Moderate · 5 src

Consistently praised: lively, punchy and engaging, with clear contrast between soft and loud passages. It's explicitly not a laid-back headphone, and the sense of drive improves further off a strong (especially tube) amp.

They are so deliciously dynamic, where soft and loud sounds are played next to each other, both being well defined

r/headphones (CapitalCount)

This is not a laid back headphone

Twister6
Measured

Cited as energetic and engaging across sources; owners report it 'opens up' and grows more dynamic with a high-current or tube amp.

Comfort

Moderate · 8 src

Excellent for most: light (375 g), soft velour pads and a self-adjusting headband that most call among the most comfortable they've worn. The real caveat is a minority report — the caliper/clamp pressure and pads pressing on the ears cause soreness or even nerve pain for some after an hour or two, so it's fit-dependent.

Meze 109 Pro is THE most comfortable headphone I’ve had the pleasure of trying till now!

Twister6

the clamping pressure, in combination with the ear pads pressing on the sides, can cause slight nerve pain after an hour or two of use.

SoundGuys (Jasper Lastoria)
Measured

375 g on a self-adjusting spring-steel headband with soft velour pads. Most report multi-hour comfort; Headfonics found 'the caliper pressure a little too high' with soreness after an hour, and SoundGuys flags possible nerve pain — a fit-and-head-shape variable, not a universal flaw.

Build

Strong consensus · 8 src

A near-universal high point: black walnut cups, a zinc-alloy and manganese-steel frame and a self-adjusting headband, widely called one of the best-built and best-looking headphones at the price, with the bonus of user-replaceable parts. Minor knocks: a spring-steel headband that can creak, a basic/microphonic stock cable and deeply recessed sockets that reject some aftermarket cables.

Meze Audio’s build aesthetics and quality are right up there at the top, one of the best in the industry!

Twister6

These unique open-back headphones allow you to repair and replace parts on as they age, which helps justify the price tag.

SoundGuys (Jasper Lastoria)
Measured

Black walnut, zinc alloy, manganese steel and vegan leather; self-adjusting headband; replaceable pads/cables/parts. Caveats owners raise: a headband that can creak when moving (unit-variable), microphonic stock cable, and cable sockets nested too deep for many third-party cables.

Isolation

Strong consensus · 4 src

Open-back by design: essentially no passive isolation, and it leaks both ways. Expected for the type and not a flaw — but it rules out offices, commutes and shared rooms.

This is not a bug but a characteristic of open-back headphones, which do not isolate well.

SoundGuys (Jasper Lastoria)
Measured

Fully open-back — negligible passive isolation and free leakage in both directions. A quiet-room, solo-listening headphone.

Best for

  • Listeners who want a fun, warm, engaging tuning with air and sparkle — not reference-flat
  • Anyone who prizes gorgeous, premium, repairable build and (for most) long-session comfort
  • People who want more bass and body than a typical open-back
  • Those who'll feed it a decent, ideally warm and powerful amp to get the best bass texture

Skip if

  • You're treble-sensitive — the lifted top end can read as sharp or sibilant (demo, or buy where you can return)
  • You want a neutral/reference tuning for critical mixing
  • You chase maximum technical performance or soundstage width per dollar — cheaper and pricier rivals out-resolve it
  • You need isolation or listen around other people (open-back leaks freely)
  • You'll only run it from a phone or weak dongle and won't add an amp

At a glance

Consensus
71 / 100weighted mean across 9 sources — an aggregate, not a single verdict
Type
Headphone
Sources
9 · 5 classes
As of
2026-07-09

Where to buy

Sources9 reviews across 5 classes. Weight reflects expertise × independence; echoes collapsed.
  1. s1Meze 109 ProPragmatic AudioMeasurement2025-03-20w0.90
  2. s2Meze Audio 109 Pro reviewSoundGuys (Jasper Lastoria)Measurementaffiliate2024-01-12w0.80
  3. s3Meze Audio 109 ProTwister6 ReviewsEditorial2023-01-08w0.78
  4. s4Meze 109 Pro review — Romanian BeautyEar Fidelity (Kamil Owczarz)Editorial2023w0.80
  5. s5Meze Audio 109 PRO ReviewHeadfonicsEditorial2022-11-05w0.82
  6. s6"Best Headphone <$1500" - Meze 109 Pro ReviewApos Audio / Passion For SoundVideoaffiliate2023-02-28w0.50
  7. s7Meze 109 Pro (owner & member impressions)Audio Science Review forumCommunity2022–2023w0.65
  8. s8Why is Meze 109 Pro so controversial?r/headphonesCommunity2023-12w0.60
  9. s9My Humble review / Critique of the Meze 109 Pror/headphones (CapitalCount)Critical2025w0.62

Limitations & method

Consensus-of-sources synthesis · as of 2026-07-09 · not a measurement verdict or ground truth.