Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
The headline disagreement. The bench sits close to target, and most reviewers call it neutral or 'bright-neutral.' A minority hear it as outright bright (wanting a warm, powerful source), and a few hear a warm lean instead — a split that tracks, in large part, how hard and how warm the source drives it.
Measured
On the bench the HE400se tracks close to the Harman target (ASR: response 'complies with our target well … usable without equalization'), with the trademark HiFiMan dip around 1–2 kHz, mostly-linear bass and mids, and a mid-treble peak near 7 kHz plus narrow resonances higher up. Sensitivity is below average (~91 dB/mW) despite low impedance.
vs. listeners — The graph is broadly neutral; 'bright' versus 'warm' versus 'neutral' is largely the same near-target tilt heard through different amps, sources and ears. Reviewers who under-power it or pair a lean source hear 'bright/thin' (Audiophile-Heaven frames the brightness as a symptom of under-driving it); those on a warm, powerful desktop chain hear 'fuller/warmer' (Headphoneer). The disagreement tracks the pairing at least as much as the headphone.
“I would describe the HE400SE’s tonal balance as one that leans towards what I personally consider to be “neutral”-sounding, with linear bass and mid responses, as well as a mostly-even treble range.”
Chrono (headphones.com)
“While sundara was delightfully bright, He400SE is quite bright and needs a warm and smooth source to sound alright.”
Audiophile-Heaven
“It is warmer sounding with more body in the mids, but lacks the huge soundstage and great imaging of the X3.”
Headphoneer
