Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Bright-neutral and analytical — a 'reference' voicing rather than a warm or fun one. Most reviewers call that balance done right (clean, neutral, a lift of air on top); a third of the weighted sources hear the same tilt as too bright, dry or cold out of the box. Taste and the treble question below drive the difference.
“The presentation is clean and dynamic, with a neutral overall signature.”
Headfonia (Yagiz)
“I’d classify it as bright-neutral, which is just about the perfect way to construct the high end IMHO.”
Home Studio Basics (Stuart Charles Black)
“Tonality leans bright and dry; not made for warmth”
Yamato37, Head-Fi showcase review
Measured
Against oratory1990's Harman over-ear 2018 target (GRAS rig): about −4 dB at 20 Hz (no bass shelf), −2 to −3 dB at 1.5–2 kHz, near-target from 3–6 kHz, +4 dB at 8 kHz and ~+10 dB at 12 kHz. ASR found 'good compliance over an important range of frequencies' with deficiencies above and below. On the same rig it is 2–3 dB brighter than the original Ananda from 1.5–8 kHz and 4–6 dB brighter above 10 kHz.
