Band: opinion spread · Dot: weighted average
Sources split on how the same graph lands. A clear majority — the labs, the ranking lists, the critics and most Head-Fi owners — hear a bright, V/U-shaped studio tilt: elevated sub-bass and treble around a scooped middle. A minority, mostly magazine and studio reviewers listening for tracking, call it relatively neutral or 'surprisingly balanced' for a V-shape. Every rig shows the tilt; the balanced camp is describing how mild it feels next to consumer headphones and the open DT 990.
Measured
Twelve frequency-response rigs measure the same shape on every impedance version. Against each rig's own HD 600: +8 to +12.5 dB at 20–40 Hz, −1 to −4 dB at 150–300 Hz, a dip of roughly −2.5 to −7.5 dB between 2.5 and 4.8 kHz, and +4 to +9 dB between 6 and 9.5 kHz (oratory1990's GRAS, RTINGS' 5128, Super* Review, unheardlab/SAI, boizoff, Gadgetry Tech, Headphone.com Legacy, Auriculares Argentina, Ragnarok; Kuulokenurkka shows it against its Harman target). RTINGS calls the signature 'Bright'.
vs. listeners — The V/U tilt is literally on every graph, so 'neutral' isn't what the rigs show; the balanced camp is weighing a broad, well-integrated bass-to-mid region and a treble lift that is wide rather than needle-sharp (Chrono's '5.5-8.5K' elevation) — and most of its members are judging it as a tracking tool against other studio cans.
“Their frequency response doesn't deviate too much from their bright sound profile.”
RTINGS
“it's surprisingly balanced-sounding with present mids (not very common for a v-shaped headphone)”
Chrono (headphones.com)
